• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双盲、安慰剂对照比较安非他酮 XR 和文拉法辛 XR 的抗抑郁疗效和耐受性。

Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR.

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline, Pharmaceuticals, New Frontiers Science Park, Harlow, UK.

出版信息

J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;24(8):1209-16. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106953. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1177/0269881109106953
PMID:19939870
Abstract

Bupropion, a noradrenaline/dopamine reuptake inhibitor, and venlafaxine, a serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, are both established antidepressants with proven efficacy in randomized controlled clinical trials. The objective of this double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, eight-week, flexible-dose study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the once-daily extended-release formulations of these two antidepressants compared with placebo. Patients with major depressive disorder were randomized to once-daily treatment with bupropion XR 150 mg (n = 204), the extended-release formulation of venlafaxine (venlafaxine XR) 75 mg (n = 198) or placebo (n = 189) during weeks 1 to 4, with the option to double the dose at week 5 if response was inadequate. In this study, bupropion XR did not demonstrate statistically significant evidence of greater improvement from baseline compared with placebo on week 8 Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating scale scores (primary endpoint) or on secondary endpoints including CGI, HAM-A and responder and remitter analyses. Descriptive statistics for venlafaxine XR indicated separation versus placebo on MADRS total scores at week 8 and other intermediate time points, and on other endpoints including CGI, HAM-A and responder and remitter analyses. Both active treatments elicited improvement on the Sheehan Disability Scale and its subscales and were generally well tolerated at the doses studied. Rates of nausea, dry mouth, dizziness, hyperhidrosis, insomnia, constipation, tremor, anorexia and male sexual dysfunction were elevated in the venlafaxine XR group, consistent with its mixed serotonergic/noradrenergic mechanism. Rates of dry mouth, insomnia and hyperhidrosis were elevated in the bupropion XR group, consistent with its catecholaminergic mechanism.

摘要

安非他酮是一种去甲肾上腺素/多巴胺再摄取抑制剂,文拉法辛是一种 5-羟色胺/去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂,两者均为已被证实的抗抑郁药,在随机对照临床试验中具有疗效。本双盲、随机、安慰剂和活性药物对照、为期 8 周、剂量灵活的研究旨在评估这两种抗抑郁药的每日 1 次的缓释制剂与安慰剂相比的疗效和耐受性。患有重性抑郁症的患者被随机分为每日治疗组,接受安非他酮 XR 150mg(n = 204)、文拉法辛的缓释制剂(文拉法辛 XR)75mg(n = 198)或安慰剂(n = 189),在第 1 周到第 4 周,如应答不足可在第 5 周加倍剂量。在这项研究中,安非他酮 XR 在第 8 周蒙哥马利抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分(主要终点)或包括 CGI、HAM-A 和应答者和缓解者分析的次要终点上与安慰剂相比,没有显示出统计学上有更大改善的证据。文拉法辛 XR 的描述性统计数据表明,在第 8 周和其他中间时间点的 MADRS 总分上与安慰剂相比有差异,并且在其他终点包括 CGI、HAM-A 和应答者和缓解者分析上也有差异。两种活性治疗方法都能改善 Sheehan 残疾量表及其子量表的评分,并且在研究剂量下通常具有良好的耐受性。在文拉法辛 XR 组中,恶心、口干、头晕、多汗、失眠、便秘、震颤、厌食和男性性功能障碍的发生率升高,这与它的混合 5-羟色胺能/去甲肾上腺素能机制一致。在安非他酮 XR 组中,口干、失眠和多汗的发生率升高,这与它的儿茶酚胺能机制一致。

相似文献

1
Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR.双盲、安慰剂对照比较安非他酮 XR 和文拉法辛 XR 的抗抑郁疗效和耐受性。
J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;24(8):1209-16. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106953. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
2
Eight-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR.安非他酮缓释片与文拉法辛缓释片抗抑郁疗效及耐受性的为期八周的安慰剂对照双盲比较
J Psychopharmacol. 2009 Jul;23(5):531-8. doi: 10.1177/0269881108089602. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
3
Comparison of vortioxetine versus venlafaxine XR in adults in Asia with major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind study.亚洲成年重度抑郁症患者中伏硫西汀与文拉法辛缓释剂的比较:一项随机双盲研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Apr;31(4):785-94. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1014028. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
4
Venlafaxine extended-release: a review of its use in the management of major depression.文拉法辛缓释剂:用于治疗重度抑郁症的综述
CNS Drugs. 2001;15(8):643-69. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115080-00007.
5
A double-blind comparison between bupropion XL and venlafaxine XR: sexual functioning, antidepressant efficacy, and tolerability.安非他酮缓释片与文拉法辛缓释片的双盲对照研究:性功能、抗抑郁疗效及耐受性
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Oct;26(5):482-8. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000239790.83707.ab.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) in outpatients with major depression. The Venlafaxine XR 209 Study Group.每日一次的文拉法辛缓释剂(XR)治疗门诊重度抑郁症患者的疗效及耐受性。文拉法辛XR 209研究组
J Clin Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;58(9):393-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v58n0904.
7
A double-blind comparison of escitalopram and venlafaxine extended release in the treatment of major depressive disorder.艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗重度抑郁症的双盲对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;65(9):1190-6. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0906.
8
Once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) and venlafaxine immediate release (IR) in outpatients with major depression. Venlafaxine XR 208 Study Group.一日一次的文拉法辛缓释剂(XR)和文拉法辛速释剂(IR)用于门诊重度抑郁症患者。文拉法辛XR 208研究组。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;9(3):157-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1026277907818.
9
Venlafaxine extended release versus citalopram in patients with depression unresponsive to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.对于对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的抑郁症患者,文拉法辛缓释剂与西酞普兰的对比研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):113-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f424c2.
10
Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.与传统选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂及文拉法辛缓释剂相比,艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006 Mar;31(2):122-31.

引用本文的文献

1
The risks of adverse events with venlafaxine for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.文拉法辛治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的不良事件风险:系统评价随机临床试验的Meta 分析和试验序贯分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Oct 23;33:e51. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000520.
2
The effects of bupropion alone and combined with naltrexone on weight loss: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials.安非他酮单药及联合纳曲酮对体重减轻的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和Meta回归分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Apr 24;16(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01319-7.
3
Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Insomnia Symptoms in Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder: Prevalence, Clinical Correlates, and the Relationship With Psychiatric Medications Use.
重度抑郁症青少年的日间过度嗜睡和失眠症状:患病率、临床相关性及与精神科药物使用的关系
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Nov;20(11):1018-1026. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0013. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
4
Practical pathway for the management of depression in the workplace: a Canadian perspective.工作场所抑郁症管理的实用路径:加拿大视角
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 5;14:1207653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1207653. eCollection 2023.
5
Population Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Extended-Release Bupropion and Its Three Metabolites in Chinese Healthy Volunteers.安非他酮缓释片及其三种代谢产物在中国健康志愿者中的群体药代动力学、安全性和耐受性
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019 Jun;44(3):339-352. doi: 10.1007/s13318-018-0537-z.
6
The effect of vortioxetine on overall patient functioning in patients with major depressive disorder.文拉法辛对伴或不伴精神病性特征的抑郁症患者总体功能的影响
Brain Behav. 2017 Feb 2;7(3):e00622. doi: 10.1002/brb3.622. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
Effects of levomilnacipran extended-release on motivation/energy and functioning in adults with major depressive disorder.左旋米那普明缓释剂对重度抑郁症成年患者动机/精力及功能的影响。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Nov;31(6):332-40. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000138.
8
Bupropion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness as an antidepressant.安非他酮:作为一种抗抑郁药有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2016 Apr;6(2):99-144. doi: 10.1177/2045125316629071. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
The Effects of Newer Antidepressants on Occupational Impairment in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.新型抗抑郁药对重性抑郁障碍职业功能损害的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
CNS Drugs. 2016 May;30(5):405-17. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0334-7.
10
Problems in the Descriptions of the Psychiatric Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Publications of Antidepressant Efficacy Trials: A Qualitative Review and Recommendations for Improved Clarity.抗抑郁药疗效试验出版物中精神科纳入和排除标准描述的问题:定性综述及提高清晰度的建议
CNS Drugs. 2016 Mar;30(3):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0314-y.