Turku PET Centre, PO Box 52, Turku FIN-20521, Finland.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Feb;108(2):378-86. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00745.2009. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
Adenosine is a widely used pharmacological agent to induce a "high-flow" control condition to study the mechanisms of exercise hyperemia, but it is not known how well an adenosine infusion depicts exercise-induced hyperemia, especially in terms of blood flow distribution at the capillary level in human muscle. Additionally, it remains to be determined what proportion of the adenosine-induced flow elevation is specifically directed to muscle only. In the present study, we measured thigh muscle capillary nutritive blood flow in nine healthy young men using PET at rest and during the femoral artery infusion of adenosine (1 mg min(-1) l thigh volume(-1)), which has previously been shown to induce a maximal whole thigh blood flow of approximately 8 l/min. This response was compared with the blood flow induced by moderate- to high-intensity one-leg dynamic knee extension exercise. Adenosine increased muscle blood flow on average to 40 +/- 7 ml x min(-1) x 100 g muscle(-1) with an aggregate value of 2.3 +/- 0.6 l/min for the whole thigh musculature. Adenosine also induced a substantial change in blood flow distribution within individuals. Muscle blood flow during the adenosine infusion was comparable with blood flow in moderate- to high-intensity exercise (36 +/- 9 ml x min(-1) x 100 g muscle(-1)), but flow heterogeneity was significantly higher during the adenosine infusion than during voluntary exercise. In conclusion, a substantial part of the flow increase in the whole limb blood flow induced by a high-dose adenosine infusion is conducted through the physiological non-nutritive shunt in muscle and/or also through tissues of the limb other than muscle. Additionally, an intra-arterial adenosine infusion does not mimic exercise hyperemia, especially in terms of muscle capillary flow heterogeneity, while the often-observed exercise-induced changes in capillary blood flow heterogeneity likely reflect true changes in nutritive flow linked to muscle fiber and vascular unit recruitment.
腺苷是一种广泛应用的药理学试剂,可诱导“高流量”控制条件,以研究运动充血的机制,但尚不清楚腺苷输注在多大程度上描绘了运动引起的充血,特别是在人体肌肉的毛细血管水平的血流分布方面。此外,尚不清楚腺苷引起的血流升高中有多大比例专门指向肌肉。在本研究中,我们使用 PET 在休息时和股动脉输注腺苷(1mg min(-1) l 股体积(-1))时测量了 9 名健康年轻男性的大腿肌肉毛细血管营养性血流,先前的研究表明,这种方法可诱导大约 8 l/min 的整个大腿血流。将该反应与中等至高强度单腿动态膝关节伸展运动引起的血流进行比较。腺苷将肌肉血流平均增加到 40 +/- 7 ml x min(-1) x 100 g 肌肉(-1),整个大腿肌肉的总流量为 2.3 +/- 0.6 l/min。腺苷还引起了个体内血流分布的实质性变化。在腺苷输注期间,肌肉血流与中等到高强度运动时的血流相当(36 +/- 9 ml x min(-1) x 100 g 肌肉(-1)),但在腺苷输注期间的血流异质性明显高于自愿运动期间。总之,高剂量腺苷输注引起的整个肢体血流增加的大部分是通过肌肉中的生理非营养性分流和/或除肌肉以外的肢体组织进行的。此外,动脉内腺苷输注不能模拟运动充血,特别是在肌肉毛细血管血流异质性方面,而经常观察到的毛细血管血流异质性的运动诱导变化可能反映了与肌肉纤维和血管单位募集相关的真正营养血流变化。