• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有固有和右心室起搏诱导的左束支传导阻滞形态的患者的心脏再同步治疗。

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intrinsic and right ventricular pacing-induced left bundle branch block pattern.

机构信息

Cardiac Center, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):e44-50. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181788cc6.

DOI:10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181788cc6
PMID:19940605
Abstract

We studied 95 consecutive patients, mean age 70 years, who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for class III or IV heart failure with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < or =35% and a QRS duration > or =120 ms. Sixty-seven patients had intrinsic left bundle branch block (LBBB) (group 1), and 28 patients had right ventricular pacing-induced LBBB (group 2). The time difference (TPW-TDI) between onset of QRS to the end of LV ejection by pulsed wave Doppler and onset of QRS to the end of systolic wave in the basal segment with greatest delay by tissue Doppler imaging was measured before CRT and at the last follow-up after CRT. TPW-TDI >50 ms was defined as left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. A positive response to CRT was defined as LV volume at end-systole decreasing > or =15% after CRT. The percentage of CRT responders in group 2 was significantly greater than that in group 1 (68% versus 42%, P = 0.04) during follow-up of 16 months. After adjusting for age, gender, and clinical features, this pattern of CRT response persisted (P = 0.008). Similarly, there was a greater reduction in QRS duration in group 2 (178 ms) after CRT versus 154 ms for group 1, P = 0.01. There was no significant difference in TPW-TDI between the 2 groups at baseline or at follow-up. There was no significant difference in mortality (15% versus 14%) and Kaplan-Meier survival plot during follow-up. Patients with heart failure and right ventricular pacing-induced LBBB have a better response rate to CRT than patients with intrinsic LBBB. The change in left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony after CRT was similar in these 2 groups of patients.

摘要

我们研究了 95 例连续患者,平均年龄 70 岁,这些患者因左心室(LV)射血分数<或=35%和 QRS 持续时间>或=120ms 而接受了 III 或 IV 类心力衰竭的心脏再同步治疗(CRT)。67 例患者存在固有左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)(组 1),28 例患者存在右心室起搏诱导的 LBBB(组 2)。在 CRT 之前和 CRT 后最后一次随访时,通过脉冲波多普勒测量 QRS 起始到 LV 射血结束的时间差(TPW-TDI)和组织多普勒成像中延迟最大的基底段收缩波起始到结束的时间差。将 TPW-TDI>50ms 定义为左心室机械不同步。将 CRT 后的 LV 收缩末期容积减少>或=15%定义为 CRT 阳性反应。在 16 个月的随访中,组 2 的 CRT 反应者百分比明显高于组 1(68%对 42%,P=0.04)。在调整年龄、性别和临床特征后,这种 CRT 反应模式仍然存在(P=0.008)。同样,组 2 的 QRS 持续时间在 CRT 后减少(178ms)明显大于组 1(154ms),P=0.01。两组在基线或随访时的 TPW-TDI 无显著差异。在随访期间,死亡率(15%对 14%)和 Kaplan-Meier 生存图无显著差异。患有心力衰竭和右心室起搏诱导的 LBBB 的患者对 CRT 的反应率高于患有固有 LBBB 的患者。这两组患者 CRT 后左心室机械不同步的变化相似。

相似文献

1
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intrinsic and right ventricular pacing-induced left bundle branch block pattern.伴有固有和右心室起搏诱导的左束支传导阻滞形态的患者的心脏再同步治疗。
Am J Ther. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):e44-50. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181788cc6.
2
Doppler myocardial imaging in patients with heart failure receiving biventricular pacing treatment.接受双心室起搏治疗的心力衰竭患者的多普勒心肌成像
Am Heart J. 2001 Nov;142(5):881-96. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.117324.
3
Diminished left ventricular dyssynchrony and impact of resynchronization in failing hearts with right versus left bundle branch block.左心室不同步性降低以及右束支与左束支传导阻滞所致心力衰竭患者再同步化治疗的影响
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 9;50(15):1484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
4
Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy--importance of left ventricular dyssynchrony.心脏再同步治疗反应的预测因素——左心室不同步的重要性。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2006 Jun;25(6):569-81.
5
Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy.左心室不同步可预测心脏再同步治疗后的反应及预后。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 2;44(9):1834-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016.
6
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction and symptoms of mild heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy.缺血性或非缺血性心肌病所致收缩期左心室功能障碍及轻度心力衰竭症状患者的心脏再同步治疗
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 15;98(2):230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.080. Epub 2006 May 19.
7
Functional behavior of patients with conventional pacemakers undergoing cardiac resynchronization.接受心脏再同步治疗的传统起搏器患者的功能行为
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008 Feb;90(2):138-43.
8
Predictive parameters of left ventricular reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure.重度充血性心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗后左心室逆向重构的预测参数
Ital Heart J. 2005 Sep;6(9):734-9.
9
Assessment of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction after cardiac pacing in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function.左心室收缩功能正常的患者心脏起搏后心力衰竭及左心室收缩功能障碍的评估
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2008 Feb;57(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2007.09.011. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
10
Evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular pacing in patients with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.左心室射血分数严重降低的患者中,右心室起搏导致左心室不同步的证据。
Europace. 2007 Jan;9(1):34-40. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul131.

引用本文的文献

1
An Enhanced Method for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Extraction Using Continuous Femoral Pigtail Countertraction.一种使用连续股动脉猪尾反向牵引提取左束支区域起搏导线的增强方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 29;15(17):2198. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172198.
2
A novel risk model for mortality and hospitalization following cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: the alpha-score.一种用于非缺血性心肌病患者心脏再同步治疗后死亡率和住院率的新型风险模型:alpha 评分。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01460-x.
3
A new baseline scoring system may help to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
一种新的基线评分系统可能有助于预测心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Arch Med Sci. 2011 Aug;7(4):627-33. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2011.24132. Epub 2011 Sep 2.