Suppr超能文献

值班放射科住院医师与放射科专家之间在使用计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影诊断肺栓塞方面的观察者间一致性。

Interobserver agreement between on-call radiology residents and radiology specialists in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using computed tomography pulmonary angiography.

作者信息

Verweij Johannes W, Hofstee Herman M A, Golding Richard P, van Waesberghe Jan-Hein T M, Smulders Yvo M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Nov-Dec;33(6):952-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181a2f7fa.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement between on-call radiology residents and radiology specialists in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE) using computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single center, prospective cohort study of 119 consecutive inpatients and outpatients with clinically suspected PE in whom CTPA was performed during out-of-office hours and weekends. The on-call radiology resident interpreted the CTPA for the presence of PE. An experienced radiology specialist, without knowledge of earlier reading, reviewed the CTPA the following morning. In discordant cases, a consensus reading was conducted. The radiology specialists' assessment and the consensus reading in case of discordance were considered as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Five CTPA studies were excluded from the analysis. In the remaining cases, radiology residents and radiology specialists agreed on the interpretations of CTPAs (no PE vs PE present) in 106 (93%) of the 114 cases, with a kappa value of 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.95). The consensus reading equally disagreed with both radiology resident and radiology specialist in 8 (7%) of the 114 discordant cases. Seven out of 8 discordant cases had suboptimal scan quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of CTPA in patients with suspected PE by radiology residents seems reliable during out-of-office hours.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估值班放射科住院医师与放射科专家在使用计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)评估肺栓塞(PE)时的观察者间一致性。

材料与方法

对119例连续的临床疑似PE的住院患者和门诊患者进行单中心前瞻性队列研究,这些患者在非工作时间和周末进行了CTPA检查。值班放射科住院医师解读CTPA以判断是否存在PE。一位经验丰富的放射科专家在不知情的情况下于次日上午复查CTPA。在意见不一致的情况下,进行共识解读。放射科专家的评估以及意见不一致时的共识解读被视为金标准。

结果

五项CTPA研究被排除在分析之外。在其余病例中,放射科住院医师和放射科专家在114例病例中的106例(93%)对CTPA的解读(无PE与存在PE)达成一致,kappa值为0.84(95%置信区间,0.74 - 0.95)。在114例意见不一致的病例中,有8例(7%)的共识解读与放射科住院医师和放射科专家的意见均不一致。8例意见不一致的病例中有7例扫描质量欠佳。

结论

放射科住院医师在非工作时间对疑似PE患者的CTPA评估似乎是可靠的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验