Ritchie S A, Rapley L P, Williams C, Johnson P H, Larkman M, Silcock R M, Long S A, Russell R C
School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia.
Med Vet Entomol. 2009 Dec;23(4):295-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00833.x.
We report on the first field evaluation of the public acceptability and performance of two types of lethal ovitrap (LO) in three separate trials in Cairns, Australia. Health workers were able to set standard lethal ovitraps (SLOs) in 75 and 71% of premise yards in the wet and dry season, respectively, and biodegradable lethal ovitraps (BLOs) in 93% of yards. Public acceptance, measured as retention of traps by residents, was high for both trap types, with <9% of traps missing after 4 weeks. Traps retaining water after 4 weeks were 78 and 34% for the two SLO trials and 58% for the BLOs. The 'failure rate' in the 535 BLOs set in the field for 4 weeks was 47%, of which 19% were lost, 51% had holes from probable insect chewing, 23% were knocked over, 7% had dried by evaporation and 1% were split. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of BLOs set on porous (grass, soil and mulch) versus solid (tiles, concrete, wood and stone) substrates. The SLOs and the BLOs were readily acceptable to ovipositing Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae); the mean number of eggs/trap was 6 and 15, for the dry season and wet season SLO trial, respectively, and 15 for the BLO wet season trial. Indeed, 84-94% of premise yards had egg positive SLOs or BLOs. A high percentage of both wet and dry season SLOs (29 and 70%, respectively) and BLOs (62%) that were dry after 4 weeks were egg positive, indicating the traps had functioned. Lethal strips from SLOs and BLOs that had been exposed for 4 weeks killed 83 and 74%, respectively, of gravid Ae. aegypti in laboratory assays. These results indicate that mass trapping schemes using SLOs and BLOs are not rejected by the public and effectively target gravid Ae. aegypti. The impact of the interventions on mosquito populations is described in a companion paper.
我们报告了在澳大利亚凯恩斯进行的三项独立试验中,对两种类型的致死性诱蚊产卵器(LO)的公众可接受性和性能进行的首次实地评估。卫生工作者在雨季和旱季分别能够在75%和71%的房屋庭院中设置标准致死性诱蚊产卵器(SLO),在93%的庭院中设置可生物降解致死性诱蚊产卵器(BLO)。以居民对诱捕器的留存率来衡量,两种诱捕器的公众接受度都很高,4周后不到9%的诱捕器丢失。在两项SLO试验中,4周后仍有水留存的诱捕器分别为78%和34%,BLO为58%。在实地设置4周的535个BLO的“故障率”为47%,其中19%丢失,51%有昆虫啃咬造成的洞,23%被撞倒,7%因蒸发变干,1%裂开。在多孔(草地、土壤和覆盖物)与固体(瓷砖、混凝土、木材和石头)基质上设置的BLO故障率没有显著差异。SLO和BLO对产卵的埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)很容易被接受;在旱季和雨季的SLO试验中,每个诱捕器的平均卵数分别为6个和15个,在BLO雨季试验中为15个。实际上,84 - 94%的房屋庭院中,SLO或BLO的诱捕器中有卵。4周后变干的雨季和旱季SLO(分别为29%和70%)以及BLO(62%)中有很高比例的诱捕器卵呈阳性,表明诱捕器发挥了作用。暴露4周的SLO和BLO的致死条带在实验室检测中分别杀死了83%和74%的妊娠埃及伊蚊。这些结果表明,使用SLO和BLO的大规模诱捕方案不会遭到公众拒绝,并且能有效针对妊娠埃及伊蚊。相关配套论文描述了这些干预措施对蚊虫种群的影响。