Division of Hematology, and Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Feb;8(2):243-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03705.x. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
In the OASIS-5 trial, fondaparinux reduced major bleeding with similar short-term efficacy as enoxaparin but lowered death and stroke during long-term follow-up. The mechanism of lower bleeding and improved efficacy with fondaparinux is uncertain.
We compared the anti-Xa concentration (reflecting drug levels), Xa clot time (reflecting anticoagulant effect) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP; a global test of hemostatic function) in plasma samples collected 6, 24 and 72 h after the first dose of the study drug in 48 patients randomly assigned fondaparinux 2.5 mg day(-1) and 42 patients assigned enoxaparin 1 mg kg(-1) twice daily in the OASIS-5 trial. Patients assigned to fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin had a significantly lower mean anti-Xa level [0.52 IU mL(-1) (SD 0.22 IU mL(-1)) vs. 1.2 IU mL(-1) (SD 0.45 IU mL(-1)), P<0.0001] and Xa clot time [64.9 s (SD 17.7 s) vs. 111.8 s (SD 29.6 s), P<0.0001], and significantly higher ETP area under the curve (AUC) [386.7 mA (SD 51.5 mA) vs. 206.4 mA (SD 90.6 mA), P<0.001] at 6 h, and these differences remained evident at 24 and 72 h. There was significantly less variability of the results of anti-Xa levels, Xa clot time and ETP AUC for fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin at 6 h (P<0.001 for each comparison).
Fondaparinux 2.5 mg day(-1) compared with enoxaparin 1 mg kg(-1) twice daily produces less variable anticoagulant effect and lower mean anticoagulant intensity. These results most likely explain the reduced risk of bleeding seen with fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin in the OASIS-5 trial and suggest that a lower intensity of anticoagulation than used in the past may be sufficient to prevent recurrent ischemic events and death in patients with ACS who are concurrently treated with aspirin and clopidogrel.
在 OASIS-5 试验中,磺达肝癸钠在减少大出血方面的效果与依诺肝素相似,但在长期随访中降低了死亡和中风的风险。磺达肝癸钠降低出血风险和提高疗效的机制尚不清楚。
我们比较了 48 例随机接受磺达肝癸钠 2.5mg/天和 42 例接受依诺肝素 1mg/kg 每日两次治疗的 OASIS-5 试验患者在首次用药后 6、24 和 72 小时采集的血浆样本中的抗 Xa 浓度(反映药物水平)、Xa 凝固时间(反映抗凝效果)和内源性凝血酶潜能(ETP;一种止血功能的全面检测)。与依诺肝素相比,磺达肝癸钠组的平均抗 Xa 水平显著较低[0.52IU/mL(SD 0.22IU/mL)比 1.2IU/mL(SD 0.45IU/mL),P<0.0001]和 Xa 凝固时间[64.9s(SD 17.7s)比 111.8s(SD 29.6s),P<0.0001],ETP 曲线下面积(AUC)显著较高[386.7mA(SD 51.5mA)比 206.4mA(SD 90.6mA),P<0.001],在 6 小时时,这些差异在 24 和 72 小时时仍然明显。与依诺肝素相比,磺达肝癸钠在 6 小时时的抗 Xa 水平、Xa 凝固时间和 ETP AUC 的结果变化明显较小(每种比较均 P<0.001)。
磺达肝癸钠 2.5mg/天与依诺肝素 1mg/kg 每日两次相比,产生的抗凝效果变化较小,抗凝强度平均较低。这些结果最有可能解释了与 OASIS-5 试验中的依诺肝素相比,磺达肝癸钠出血风险降低的原因,并表明与过去相比,强度较低的抗凝治疗可能足以预防同时接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗的 ACS 患者的复发性缺血事件和死亡。