Department of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, 200 Via Sacra, Hampden-Sydney, VA 23943, USA.
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2010 Mar-May;39(2-3):174-90. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
We review issues of myriapod phylogeny, from the position of the Myriapoda amongst arthropods to the relationships of the orders of the classes Chilopoda and Diplopoda. The fossil record of each myriapod class is reviewed, with an emphasis on developments since 1997. We accept as working hypotheses that Myriapoda is monophyletic and belongs in Mandibulata, that the classes of Myriapoda are monophyletic, and that they are related as (Chilopoda (Symphyla (Diplopoda+Pauropoda))). The most pressing challenges to these hypotheses are some molecular and developmental evidence for an alliance between myriapods and chelicerates, and the attraction of symphylans to pauropods in some molecular analyses. While the phylogeny of the orders of Chilopoda appears settled, the relationships within Diplopoda remain unclear at several levels. Chilopoda and Diplopoda have a relatively sparse representation as fossils, and Symphyla and Pauropoda fossils are known only from Tertiary ambers. Fossils are difficult to place in trees based on living forms because many morphological characters are not very likely to be preserved in the fossils; as a consequence, most diplopod fossils have been placed in extinct higher taxa. Nevertheless, important information from diplopod fossils includes the first documented occurrence of air-breathing, and the first evidence for the use of a chemical defense. Stem-group myriapods are unknown, but evidence suggests the group must have arisen in the Early Cambrian, with a major period of cladogenesis in the Late Ordovician and early Silurian. Large terrestrial myriapods were on land at least by mid-Silurian.
我们回顾了多足动物系统发育的问题,从多足动物在节肢动物中的位置到唇足纲和倍足纲各目之间的关系。我们回顾了每个多足纲类群的化石记录,重点关注自 1997 年以来的发展。我们接受以下工作假设:多足动物是单系的,属于颚附肢动物,多足动物的各纲是单系的,它们的关系是(唇足纲(唇足目(倍足纲+马陆目)))。这些假设最紧迫的挑战是一些分子和发育证据表明多足动物与螯肢动物有联盟关系,以及在一些分子分析中,同翅目与马陆目有吸引力。虽然唇足目各目的系统发育似乎已经确定,但倍足纲内部的关系在几个层面上仍然不清楚。唇足目和倍足纲的化石记录相对较少,而唇足目和马陆目仅知存在于第三纪琥珀中。由于许多形态特征不太可能在化石中保存下来,因此根据现存形式很难将化石置于树状图中;因此,大多数倍足纲化石都被归入已灭绝的高级分类群。尽管如此,倍足纲化石中的重要信息包括有记录以来首次出现的空气呼吸,以及首次有证据表明使用了化学防御。祖生性的多足动物是未知的,但有证据表明该组必须起源于早寒武纪,在奥陶纪晚期和志留纪早期有一个主要的分支进化时期。大型陆生多足动物至少在志留纪中期已经在陆地上了。