Randomized comparison of nasolacrimal cryoplasty versus plastic lacrimal stenting in the management of epiphora in adults.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of plastic polyurethane stents compared with nasolacrimal cryoplasty in the management of epiphora in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (N = 37; mean age, 64 years; range, 34-86 y; six men, 31 women) with severe epiphora with partial/complete obstruction of the nasolacrimal system were randomized to have a plastic stent inserted (n = 19) or to undergo balloon dilation cryoplasty (n = 18). Both procedures were conducted on an outpatient basis. Patency was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Initial technical success rate and immediate resolution of epiphora was complete in all cases. At 6 months of follow-up, outcomes were already significantly different between the treatment groups and hence the study was discontinued. Plastic stent placement achieved a primary patency rate of 59.6% at 6 months, compared with 12.4% in the cryoplasty group (P < .0004). Multivariate analysis indicated that other measured variables (sex, age, etiology, previous treatment, and the interventional radiologist's expertise) had no significant effect on the outcomes (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial success was good in both treatment groups, with nasolacrimal plastic stent placement achieving a level of primary patency superior to the cryoplasty procedure for the relief of epiphora on short-term follow-up. However, long-term outcome evaluation is needed before stent placement can be recommended as an alternative to more established surgical procedures.