Department of Cerebro and Cardiovascular Disease, National Centre of Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Aug;20(4):397-402. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp194. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
Possible effect modifiers are often considered as confounders when applying pre-defined risk-adjustment models. The aim was to provide evidence of effect modification by gender in comparative evaluations of hospitals on 30-day in-hospital mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Ninety-two Italian hospitals discharging more than 300 patients with a diagnosis of AMI during 2004 were considered. Patients discharged or transferred within 48 h of hospital admission were excluded. Comorbidities recorded in previous and current admissions were used to define patients' health status and to build the adjustment model, in which an interaction term (gender by hospital) was introduced to test the presence of effect modification. The end point was the 30-day in-hospital mortality after AMI.
The study population consists of 38,544 incident events of AMI from 92 Italian hospitals. Eleven hospitals showed a significant effect modification by gender. In one of them, the overall mortality rate was comparable with that of the reference category, but a significant excess risk for women was found [odds ratios (ORs) = 2.3; P < 0.01]. In 10 hospitals, the overall adjusted ORs presented a significant excess mortality compared with the benchmark: three had a significant excess mortality only among females (ranging from 230 to 370%), four only among males (ranging from 110 to 200%), and three among both genders.
An effect modification by gender was found. The results suggest that in comparative hospital performances evaluation, stratification by gender is desirable to investigate possible differences in attitudes and practices of health services in the treatment of men and women.
在应用预先定义的风险调整模型时,通常将可能的效应修饰符视为混杂因素。本研究旨在为性别在急性心肌梗死(AMI)后 30 天院内死亡率的医院比较评估中的效应修饰作用提供证据。
共纳入了 2004 年期间 discharge 了 300 例以上 AMI 患者的 92 家意大利医院。排除了入院 48 小时内 discharge 或转院的患者。使用之前和当前住院记录的合并症来定义患者的健康状况,并构建调整模型,在该模型中引入了一个交互项(性别与医院)来检验是否存在效应修饰作用。终点是 AMI 后 30 天的院内死亡率。
该研究人群包括来自 92 家意大利医院的 38544 例 AMI 事件。11 家医院显示出性别存在显著的效应修饰作用。其中一家医院的总死亡率与参照组相当,但女性的风险显著增加[比值比(ORs)=2.3;P<0.01]。在 10 家医院中,整体调整后的 ORs 与基准相比呈现出显著的超额死亡率:其中 3 家医院仅在女性中存在显著的超额死亡率(范围从 230%到 370%),4 家仅在男性中存在显著的超额死亡率(范围从 110%到 200%),3 家在两性中均存在。
发现了性别效应修饰作用。结果表明,在医院绩效比较评估中,按性别分层是必要的,以调查卫生服务在治疗男性和女性方面的态度和实践可能存在的差异。