Innovation in Bioengineering Research Group, University of Castilla La Mancha, Campus Universitario, 16071 Cuenca, Spain.
Physiol Meas. 2010 Jan;31(1):115-30. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/1/008. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. In the first stages of the disease, AF may terminate spontaneously and it is referred to as paroxysmal AF. The arrhythmia is called persistent AF when external intervention is required to its termination. In the present work, a method to non-invasively assess AF organization has been applied to discern between paroxysmal and persistent AF episodes at any time. Previous works have suggested that the probability of AF termination is inversely related to the number of reentries wandering throughout the atrial tissue. Given that it has also been hypothesized that the number of reentries is directly correlated with AF organization, a fast and robust method able to assess organization differences in AF could be of great interest. In fact, the distinction between paroxysmal and persistent episodes in patients without previously known AF history, making use of short ECG recordings, could contribute to taking earlier decisions on AF management in daily clinical practice, without the need to require 24 h or 48 h Holter recordings. The method was based on a nonlinear regularity index, such as sample entropy (SampEn), and evidenced to be a significant discriminator of the AF type. Its diagnostic accuracy of 91.80% was demonstrated to be superior to previously proposed parameters, such as dominant atrial frequency (DAF) and fibrillatory waves amplitude, and to others analyzed for the first time in this context, such as atrial activity mean power, 3 dB bandwidth around the DAF, first harmonic frequency, harmonic exponential decay, etc. Additionally, according to previous invasive works, paroxysmal AF episodes (0.0716 +/- 0.0143) presented lower SampEn values and, consequently, more organized activity, than persistent episodes (0.1080 +/- 0.0145).
心房颤动(AF)是临床实践中最常见的心律失常。在疾病的早期阶段,AF 可能会自行终止,称为阵发性 AF。当需要外部干预来终止心律失常时,称为持续性 AF。在目前的工作中,应用了一种非侵入性评估 AF 组织的方法,以便在任何时候辨别阵发性和持续性 AF 发作。以前的工作表明,AF 终止的概率与在心房组织中漫游的折返次数成反比。鉴于还假设折返次数与 AF 组织直接相关,因此能够评估 AF 组织差异的快速而稳健的方法可能非常有意义。事实上,在没有先前已知 AF 病史的患者中,利用短 ECG 记录区分阵发性和持续性发作,可能有助于在日常临床实践中更早地决定 AF 的管理,而无需要求 24 小时或 48 小时 Holter 记录。该方法基于非线性规则性指数,例如样本熵(SampEn),并被证明是区分 AF 类型的重要指标。其 91.80%的诊断准确率被证明优于先前提出的参数,例如主导心房频率(DAF)和纤维波幅度,并且优于首次在该背景下分析的其他参数,例如心房活动平均功率、DAF 周围的 3 dB 带宽、第一谐波频率、谐波指数衰减等。此外,根据以前的侵入性工作,阵发性 AF 发作(0.0716 +/- 0.0143)的 SampEn 值较低,因此活动更有组织,而持续性 AF 发作(0.1080 +/- 0.0145)则较高。