Qadri Ghalib Walid, Noor Siti Noor Fazliah Mohd, Mohamad Dasmawati
Paediatric Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, University Science Malaysia, Health Campus, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Pediatr Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):389-94.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different repairing techniques of a fractured sealant on microleakage in vitro.
A nono-filled flowable composite (Filtek Z350) was placed on the occlusal surfaces of 112 intact extracted molars following cleoning by prophylaxis and acid etching. Sealant failure was produced on the entire sample. The teeth were then randomly allocated into 4 groups, each representing a different method of repair: group 1 (control)-prophylaxis brush followed by acid etching and 10 seconds of curing time; group 2-prophylaxis brush, acid etching, application of bonding agent, and 10 seconds of curing time; group 3-prophylaxis brush, acid etching, and 5 seconds of curing time; and group 4-prophylaxis brush, acid etching, and 20 seconds of curing time. Then, they were pointed with varnish and immersed in 1% methylene blue. The teeth were then sectioned, and a total of 648 surfaces were scored for microleakage.
Statistical analysis did not demonstrate any one method of repair to be superior to the control method. There were no significant differences in microleakage between 10 and 20 seconds of curing time.
Prophylaxis brush, acid etching, and light-emitting diode light curing for 10 seconds seems to be the simplest and the most appropriate method of repair and is, therefore, recommended.
本研究旨在评估断裂封闭剂的不同修复技术对体外微渗漏的影响。
在112颗完整拔除的磨牙的咬合面上放置一种不含填料的可流动复合树脂(Filtek Z350),经过预防性清洁和酸蚀处理。对整个样本造成封闭剂失败。然后将牙齿随机分为4组,每组代表一种不同的修复方法:第1组(对照组)——预防性刷牙,随后酸蚀并固化10秒;第2组——预防性刷牙、酸蚀、应用粘结剂并固化10秒;第3组——预防性刷牙、酸蚀并固化5秒;第4组——预防性刷牙、酸蚀并固化20秒。然后,用清漆涂抹牙齿并将其浸入1%的亚甲蓝中。随后将牙齿切片,对总共648个表面进行微渗漏评分。
统计分析未表明任何一种修复方法优于对照方法。固化10秒和20秒之间的微渗漏无显著差异。
预防性刷牙、酸蚀以及发光二极管光照固化10秒似乎是最简单且最合适的修复方法,因此予以推荐。