Suppr超能文献

皮下注射头孢曲松联合或不联合重组人透明质酸酶(rHuPH20)与静脉注射头孢曲松在成人志愿者中的安全性和药代动力学比较。

Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous ceftriaxone administered with or without recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) versus intravenous ceftriaxone administration in adult volunteers.

机构信息

Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, USA. george

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Feb;26(2):279-88. doi: 10.1185/03007990903432900.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)-facilitated subcutaneous (SC) ceftriaxone administration versus SC ceftriaxone preceded by SC saline placebo or intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone administration.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This Phase I, two-part, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in 54 healthy volunteers. In Part 1 (N = 24), subjects received 1 mL rHuPH20 (150 USP units) or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) SC, followed by 1 or 2 g ceftriaxone (10-350 mg/mL). In Part 2 (N = 30), subjects received 1 g ceftriaxone at the Part 1 maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) administered either SC - preceded by SC rHuPH20 or placebo - or IV. Subjects were monitored for adverse events (AEs); blood samples were obtained (Part 2 only) during 48 hours post-dosing for ceftriaxone bioanalysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Part 1 primary endpoint was the SC ceftriaxone (with or without rHuPH20) MTC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in Part 2. Bioequivalence was based on maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The highest SC ceftriaxone concentration tested in Part 1 (350 mg/mL) was selected as the Part 2 MTC. In Part 2, median time to maximum concentration (t(max)) was 1 hour earlier (P < 0.0001), and C(max) was 12% higher (P < 0.0001) for ceftriaxone (350 mg/mL) administered via rHuPH20-facilitated SC versus SC preceded by placebo. IV ceftriaxone led to higher C(max) and shorter t(max) values than either SC treatment. Ceftriaxone exposure (AUC) was comparable among all three treatments. At least 1 AE was experienced by 100% of subjects after SC ceftriaxone and 76% after IV; most commonly reported AEs were infusion-site reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftriaxone AUC did not differ significantly between the three administration routes. C(max) was higher and t(max) shorter with rHuPH20-facilitated SC than SC preceded by placebo. rHuPH20-facilitated SC ceftriaxone was generally well tolerated. This study is limited by evaluation of healthy adults and absence of repeated-dose groups.

摘要

目的

比较重组人透明质酸酶(rHuPH20)辅助下的皮下(SC)头孢曲松给药与 SC 生理盐水安慰剂预处理或静脉(IV)头孢曲松给药的药代动力学和安全性。

研究设计和方法

这是一项在 54 名健康志愿者中进行的、分为两部分的、安慰剂对照的、交叉研究。在第 1 部分(N=24)中,受试者接受 1 mL rHuPH20(150 USP 单位)或安慰剂(0.9%氯化钠)SC,然后接受 1 或 2 g 头孢曲松(10-350 mg/mL)。在第 2 部分(N=30)中,受试者在第 1 部分最大耐受浓度(MTC)下接受 1 g 头孢曲松,该 MTC 是通过 SC 给药的 - 之前是 SC rHuPH20 还是安慰剂 - 或 IV。监测受试者的不良事件(AE);在给药后 48 小时仅在第 2 部分采集血样,用于头孢曲松的生物分析。

主要观察指标

第 1 部分的主要终点是 SC 头孢曲松(有或没有 rHuPH20)的 MTC。第 2 部分确定药代动力学参数。生物等效性基于最大浓度(C(max))和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

第 1 部分中测试的最高 SC 头孢曲松浓度(350 mg/mL)被选为第 2 部分的 MTC。在第 2 部分中,与 SC 安慰剂预处理相比,rHuPH20 辅助 SC 给药的头孢曲松(350 mg/mL)的最大浓度(C(max))时间更早(P < 0.0001),并且 C(max)更高(P < 0.0001)。与 SC 治疗相比,IV 头孢曲松导致更高的 C(max)和更短的 t(max)值。三种治疗方法的头孢曲松暴露(AUC)相似。接受 SC 头孢曲松治疗的受试者中,至少有 100%经历了 1 种 AE,接受 IV 治疗的受试者中有 76%经历了 1 种 AE;最常见的报告 AE 是输液部位反应。

结论

三种给药途径的头孢曲松 AUC 无显著差异。rHuPH20 辅助 SC 给药的 C(max)高于 SC 安慰剂预处理,t(max)更短。rHuPH20 辅助 SC 头孢曲松一般耐受性良好。该研究的局限性在于仅评估了健康成年人,且缺乏重复剂量组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验