Martinelli V, Rocca M A, Annovazzi P, Pulizzi A, Rodegher M, Martinelli Boneschi F, Scotti R, Falini A, Sormani M P, Comi G, Filippi M
Department of Neurology, Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Scientific Institute and University Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Neurology. 2009 Dec 1;73(22):1842-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c3fd5b.
To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of IV methylprednisolone (IV MP) vs oral methylprednisolone (oMP) at equivalent high doses in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experiencing a recent relapse.
Patients with a clinical relapse within the previous 2 weeks and at least 1 gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion on a screening brain MRI scan were included. Forty patients with MS were randomized to receive either 1 g/day for 5 days of oMP (20 patients) or 1 g/day for 5 days of IV MP (20 patients). Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and brain MRI (dual-echo and postcontrast T1-weighted scans) were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 and 4. The study primary research question (endpoint) was to compare the efficacy of the 2 treatment routes in reducing the number of Gd-enhancing lesions after 1 week from treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy profiles of the 2 routes of administration.
The 2 groups showed a reduction of Gd-enhancing lesions over time (p = 0.002 for oMP and p = 0.001 for IV MP) with a "non-inferiority effect" between the 2 routes of administration at week 1. Both groups showed an improvement of EDSS over time (p < 0.001) without between-group difference at week 4. Both treatments were well-tolerated and adverse events were minimal and occurred similarly in the 2 treatment arms.
Oral methylprednisolone (oMP) is as effective as IV methylprednisolone in reducing gadolinium-enhancing lesions in patients with MS soon after an acute relapse with similar clinical, safety, and tolerability profiles. This study provides class III evidence that 1 g oMP x 5 days is not inferior to 1 g IV MP x 5 days in reducing the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions over a period of 1 week (mean difference in lesion reduction comparing IV MP to oMP is -20%, 95% confidence interval -48% to + 5%).
比较静脉注射甲泼尼龙(IV MP)与口服甲泼尼龙(oMP)在等效高剂量时对近期复发的多发性硬化症(MS)患者的疗效、耐受性及安全性。
纳入在过去2周内有临床复发且在筛查脑部MRI扫描中有至少1个钆(Gd)增强病灶的患者。40例MS患者被随机分为两组,一组20例接受oMP 1 g/天,共5天;另一组20例接受IV MP 1 g/天,共5天。在基线、第1周和第4周评估扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)和脑部MRI(双回波和增强后T1加权扫描)。研究的主要研究问题(终点)是比较两种治疗途径在治疗开始1周后减少Gd增强病灶数量的疗效。次要结局是两种给药途径的安全性、耐受性和临床疗效概况。
两组随时间推移Gd增强病灶均减少(oMP组p = 0.002,IV MP组p = 0.001),在第1周时两种给药途径之间有“非劣效性效应”。两组EDSS随时间均有改善(p < 0.001),在第4周时组间无差异。两种治疗耐受性均良好,不良事件极少,且在两个治疗组中发生率相似。
口服甲泼尼龙(oMP)在急性复发后不久对MS患者减少钆增强病灶方面与静脉注射甲泼尼龙效果相同,临床、安全性和耐受性概况相似。本研究提供了III级证据,即1 g oMP×5天在1周内减少钆增强病灶数量方面不劣于1 g IV MP×5天(IV MP与oMP相比病灶减少的平均差异为-20%,95%置信区间为-48%至+5%)。