• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用 CHADS2 风险评分指导房颤患者抗栓治疗——仍有改进空间。

Use of the CHADS2 risk score to guide antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation--room for improvement.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2010 Feb 6;140(5-6):73-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2010.12943.

DOI:10.4414/smw.2010.12943
PMID:19950036
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic treatment (AT) is recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), except for those with lone AF or contraindications.

AIM

The aim of our study was to determine contemporary AT in AF patients and to ascertain reasons for withholding oral anticoagulant treatment (OAC) in eligible patients.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were screened for non-valvular paroxysmal or permanent AF. Subjects with newly diagnosed AF or with an indication for AT other than AF were excluded. According to the CHADS2 risk score patients were divided into a low- (CHADS2 = 0), an intermediate (CHADS2 = 1) and a high risk group (CHADS2 > or =2). AT on hospital admission was correlated to current guidelines.

RESULTS

389 patients were screened and 84 (22%) excluded (71 new onset AF, 13 other indications for OAC). Of the remaining 305 patients (80 +/- 10 yrs) 43% had paroxysmal and 57% permanent AF. Eleven patients (4%) were classified as low risk, 61 (20%) as intermediate risk, and 233 (76%) as high risk. In patients at low risk OAC was prescribed in 63%, whereas one third of those at high risk were not on anticoagulant therapy. The main reasons why OAC was withheld in high risk patients were presumed risk of fall in 21 patients (27%), while the grounds were a history of major bleeding and presumed drug non-compliance in 13 (17%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this survey of AF-patients, AT was not tailored to the thromboembolic risk.

摘要

背景

除了孤立性房颤或有禁忌症的患者,推荐对房颤(AF)患者进行抗血栓治疗(AT)。

目的

我们的研究目的是确定 AF 患者的当代 AT,并确定有资格接受口服抗凝治疗(OAC)的患者中不使用 OAC 的原因。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

方法

连续筛查非瓣膜性阵发性或永久性 AF 患者。排除新诊断为 AF 或有 AT 指征而非 AF 的患者。根据 CHADS2 风险评分,患者分为低危(CHADS2=0)、中危(CHADS2=1)和高危组(CHADS2≥2)。入院时的 AT 与现行指南相关联。

结果

共筛查 389 例患者,排除 84 例(71 例新发 AF,13 例 OAC 其他指征)。剩余的 305 例患者(80±10 岁)中,43%为阵发性,57%为永久性 AF。11 例(4%)为低危,61 例(20%)为中危,233 例(76%)为高危。低危患者中 OAC 处方率为 63%,而高危患者中有三分之一未接受抗凝治疗。高危患者中不使用 OAC 的主要原因是有 21 例(27%)推测有跌倒风险,有 13 例(17%)分别有大出血史和推测药物不依从史。

结论

在这项对 AF 患者的调查中,AT 并未根据血栓栓塞风险进行调整。

相似文献

1
Use of the CHADS2 risk score to guide antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation--room for improvement.应用 CHADS2 风险评分指导房颤患者抗栓治疗——仍有改进空间。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2010 Feb 6;140(5-6):73-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2010.12943.
2
Contemporary Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Prescription in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at Low to Moderate Risk of Stroke After Guideline-Recommended Change in Use of the CHADS to the CHADS-VASc Score for Thromboembolic Risk Assessment: Analysis From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Outpatient Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Atrial Fibrillation Registry.在采用CHADS-VASc评分替代CHADS评分进行血栓栓塞风险评估的指南推荐更改后,低至中度卒中风险心房颤动患者口服抗凝药处方的当代趋势:来自国家心血管数据注册中心门诊实践创新与临床卓越心房颤动注册研究的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003476.
3
Residential medication management reviews of antithrombotic therapy in aged care residents with atrial fibrillation: assessment of stroke and bleeding risk.老年护理机构中房颤患者抗栓治疗的居家药物管理评估:卒中与出血风险评估
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Jun;41(3):279-84. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12385. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
Reasons for undertreatment with oral anticoagulants in frail geriatric outpatients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective, descriptive study.衰弱的老年房颤门诊患者口服抗凝剂治疗不足的原因:一项前瞻性描述性研究。
Drugs Aging. 2010 Jan 1;27(1):39-50. doi: 10.2165/11319540-000000000-00000.
5
Antithrombotic treatment and the risk of death and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score=1.抗血栓治疗与 CHADS2 评分为 1 的房颤患者的死亡和卒中风险。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Apr;103(4):833-40. doi: 10.1160/TH09-10-0746. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
6
Differences in oral anticoagulant prescriptions between specialists and non-specialists in patients with cardioembolic stroke caused by non-valvular atrial fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动引起的心源性脑栓塞患者中,专科医生与非专科医生之间的口服抗凝药物处方差异。
Heart Vessels. 2022 May;37(5):867-874. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01984-y. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
Guideline adherence of antithrombotic treatment initiated by general practitioners in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Danish survey.丹麦调查:全科医生启动的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗栓治疗的指南遵循情况。
Clin Cardiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):427-32. doi: 10.1002/clc.22133. Epub 2013 May 13.
8
Does sex affect anticoagulant use for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation? The prospective global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation.性别是否会影响非瓣膜性心房颤动患者预防中风时抗凝药物的使用?FIELD-心房颤动前瞻性全球抗凝登记研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2 Suppl 1):S12-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001556. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
9
Use of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation is highly variable and only weakly associated with estimated stroke risk: cross-sectional population database study.口服抗凝药在心房颤动中的使用差异很大,且与估计的中风风险仅有微弱关联:横断面人群数据库研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Sep;20(3):181-9. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.852535. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
10
New oral anticoagulants for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation: a single centre experience.新型口服抗凝药预防心房颤动血栓栓塞并发症的单中心经验
Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(2):85-93. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2014.0168. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The evaluation of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with non-hemorrhagic stroke and atrial fibrillation.非出血性卒中和心房颤动患者左心室舒张功能障碍的评估
ARYA Atheroscler. 2017 Nov;13(6):299-303.
2
Emergency Physician Patterns Related to Anticoagulation of Patients with Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter.近期发作的心房颤动和心房扑动患者抗凝治疗相关的急诊医师模式
J Atr Fibrillation. 2013 Apr 6;5(6):645. doi: 10.4022/jafib.645. eCollection 2013 Apr-May.
3
Impact of a Computerized Antithrombotic Risk Assessment Tool on the Prescription of Thromboprophylaxis in Atrial Fibrillation: Hospital Setting.
计算机化抗血栓风险评估工具对心房颤动患者血栓预防处方的影响:医院环境
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Jan;24(1):85-92. doi: 10.1177/1076029616670031. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction: brand-name versus generic formulations.胺碘酮致甲状腺功能紊乱:原研药与仿制药。
CMAJ. 2011 Sep 6;183(12):E817-23. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101800. Epub 2011 Jul 11.