Qin Yan, Shi Yuan-Kai, He Xiao-Hui, Han Xiao-Hong, Zhou Sheng-Yu, Liu Peng, Yang Jian-Liang, Yang Sheng, Zhang Chang-Gong, Dong Mei, Zhou Li-Qiang, Wang Jin-Wan, Feng Feng-Yi, Sun Yan
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital (Institute), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijiing 100021, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;31(6):469-73.
To retrospectively analyze and compare the treatment efficiency of CHOP-based regimens with or without high-dose consolidation treatment combined with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDT-HSCT) in the patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL).
From 1989 to 2004, totally 63 patients with LBL were initially treated with a standard CHOP-based regimen. Forty-two of the 63 patients achieved complete response (CR), 26 of those subsequently received consolidation HDT-HSCT, while the other 16 had 6-8 cycles of standard CHOP-based treatment only.
Of the 63 patients, 57 had a T-LBL and 6 B-LBL, with a median age of 20 years, 19 (30.2%) had a stage I-II diseases and 44 (69.8%) stage III-IV diseases, 61.9% presented with a mediastinal mass. Bone marrow involvement presented in 28.6% of the patients. Fourteen percent had central nervous system involvement. The median follow-up period was 24 months, and the estimated 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival of this series was 31.2% and 29.3%, respectively. Of the 42 patients who achieved CR, the 5-year OS rate of the patients who received HDT-HSCT as a consolidation therapy was 59.8% versus 14.6% of the patients treated by CHOP-based regimens alone (P=0.004). Bone marrow involvement, age > or =20 years, short response duration and primary refractory disease were factors significantly associated with poor outcome. Among the 18 patients with bone marrow involvement, 3 received allogeneic HSCT and were all still alive at the follow up time of 22, 32 and 37 months, respectively, while another 4 received auto-HSCT and all died of the disease within 14 months.
Short term treatment with a CHOP-based regimen is not sufficient for the patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma. High-dose consolidation treatment and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may improve overall survival and disease free survival. Bone marrow involvement, age >20 years, and short response duration and primary refractory disease are all the factors significantly associated with poor outcome. For the patients with bone marrow involvement, allohematopoietic stem cell transplantation is superior to auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
回顾性分析和比较基于CHOP方案的化疗方案联合或不联合大剂量巩固治疗及造血干细胞移植(HDT-HSCT)对淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(LBL)患者的治疗效果。
1989年至2004年,共有63例LBL患者最初接受基于CHOP方案的标准化疗。63例患者中有42例达到完全缓解(CR),其中26例随后接受巩固性HDT-HSCT,另外16例仅接受6-8周期基于CHOP方案的标准化疗。
63例患者中,57例为T-LBL,6例为B-LBL,中位年龄20岁,19例(30.2%)为Ⅰ-Ⅱ期疾病,44例(69.8%)为Ⅲ-Ⅳ期疾病,61.9%有纵隔肿块。28.6%的患者有骨髓受累。14%有中枢神经系统受累。中位随访期为24个月,该组患者估计的5年总生存率和无病生存率分别为31.2%和29.3%。在42例达到CR的患者中,接受HDT-HSCT作为巩固治疗的患者5年总生存率为59.8%,而仅接受基于CHOP方案化疗的患者为14.6%(P=0.004)。骨髓受累、年龄≥20岁、缓解期短和原发性难治性疾病是与预后不良显著相关的因素。在18例有骨髓受累的患者中,3例接受了异基因HSCT,分别在随访22、32和37个月时仍存活,而另外4例接受自体HSCT患者均在14个月内死于该疾病。
基于CHOP方案的短期化疗对淋巴细胞淋巴瘤患者是不够的。大剂量巩固治疗和造血干细胞移植可能提高总生存率和无病生存率。骨髓受累、年龄>20岁、缓解期短和原发性难治性疾病均是与预后不良显著相关的因素。对于有骨髓受累的患者,异基因造血干细胞移植优于自体造血干细胞移植。