Department of Psychology, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Feb;34(2):214-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01084.x. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
Specialized hypothalamic systems that increase food intake might also increase ethanol intake. To test this possibility, morphine and receptor-specific opioid agonists were microinjected in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of rats that had learned to drink ethanol. To cross-validate the results, naloxone methiodide (m-naloxone), an opioid antagonist, was microinjected with the expectation that it would have the opposite effect of morphine and the specific opioid agonists.
Sprague-Dawley rats were trained, without sugar, to drink 4 or 7% ethanol and were then implanted with chronic brain cannulas aimed at the PVN. After recovery, those drinking 7% ethanol, with food and water available, were injected with 2 doses each of morphine or m-naloxone. To test for receptor specificity, 2 doses each of the mu-receptor agonist [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-Enkephalin (DAMGO), delta-receptor agonist D-Ala-Gly-Phe-Met-NH2 (DALA), or kappa-receptor agonist U-50,488H were injected. DAMGO was also tested in rats drinking 4% ethanol without food or water available. As an anatomical control for drug reflux, injections were made 2 mm dorsal to the PVN.
A main result was a significant increase in ethanol intake induced by PVN injection of morphine. The opposite effect was produced by m-naloxone. The effects of morphine and m-naloxone were exclusively on intake of ethanol, even though food and water were freely available. In the analysis with specific receptor agonists, PVN injection of the delta-agonist DALA significantly increased 7% ethanol intake without affecting food or water intake. This is in contrast to the kappa-agonist U-50,488H, which decreased ethanol intake, and the mu-agonist DAMGO, which had no effect on ethanol intake in the presence or absence of food and water. In the anatomical control location 2 mm dorsal to the PVN, no drug caused any significant changes in ethanol, food, or water intake, providing evidence that the active site was close to the cannula tip.
The delta-opioid receptor agonist in the PVN increased ethanol intake in strong preference over food and water, while the kappa-opioid agonist suppressed ethanol intake. Prior studies show that learning to drink ethanol stimulates PVN expression and production of the peptides enkephalin and dynorphin, which are endogenous agonists for the delta- and kappa-receptors, respectively. These results suggest that enkephalin via the delta-opioid system can function locally within a positive feedback circuit to cause ethanol intake to escalate and ultimately contribute to the abuse of ethanol. This is in contrast to dynorphin via the kappa-opioid system, which may act to counter this escalation. Naltrexone therapy for alcoholism may act, in part, by blocking the enkephalin-triggered positive feedback cycle.
专门的下丘脑系统可以增加食物摄入量,也可能增加乙醇摄入量。为了验证这种可能性,吗啡和受体特异性阿片类激动剂被注射到已经学会饮用乙醇的大鼠的室旁核(PVN)中。为了交叉验证结果,预期纳洛酮甲碘化物(m-纳洛酮),一种阿片类拮抗剂,会产生与吗啡和特定阿片类激动剂相反的作用。
斯普拉格-道利大鼠在没有糖的情况下接受训练,以饮用 4%或 7%的乙醇,然后植入慢性脑套管,目标是 PVN。恢复后,那些饮用 7%乙醇的大鼠,有食物和水供应,分别注射 2 次吗啡或 m-纳洛酮。为了测试受体特异性,分别注射 2 次 μ-受体激动剂 [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-Enkephalin(DAMGO)、δ-受体激动剂 D-Ala-Gly-Phe-Met-NH2(DALA)或 κ-受体激动剂 U-50,488H。DAMGO 也在没有食物或水供应的情况下饮用 4%乙醇的大鼠中进行了测试。作为药物反流的解剖学对照,注射在 PVN 后 2 毫米处进行。
一个主要结果是 PVN 注射吗啡显著增加了乙醇的摄入量。m-纳洛酮产生相反的效果。吗啡和 m-纳洛酮的作用仅针对乙醇的摄入,即使食物和水是自由供应的。在特定受体激动剂的分析中,PVN 注射 δ-激动剂 DALA 显著增加了 7%的乙醇摄入量,而不影响食物或水的摄入量。这与 κ-激动剂 U-50,488H 形成对比,后者减少了乙醇的摄入量,而 μ-激动剂 DAMGO 则在有或没有食物和水的情况下对乙醇的摄入量没有影响。在 PVN 后 2 毫米的解剖学对照位置,没有药物引起乙醇、食物或水摄入的任何显著变化,这提供了一个证据,即活性部位接近套管尖端。
PVN 中的 δ-阿片受体激动剂优先增加乙醇的摄入量,而不是食物和水,而 κ-阿片受体激动剂则抑制乙醇的摄入量。先前的研究表明,学会饮用乙醇会刺激 PVN 表达和内啡肽和强啡肽的产生,它们分别是 δ-和 κ-受体的内源性激动剂。这些结果表明,内啡肽通过 δ-阿片系统可以在正反馈回路中局部发挥作用,导致乙醇摄入量增加,并最终导致乙醇滥用。这与通过 κ-阿片系统的强啡肽相反,它可能起到抑制这种增加的作用。纳曲酮治疗酒精中毒可能部分通过阻断内啡肽触发的正反馈循环起作用。