Sun Feng, Tao Qiu-shan, Hsu Yi-hua, Zhan Si-yan
Department of Epidemiology and Bio-statistics, Peking University Public Health School, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;47(6):405-9.
To compare the differences of two recommended diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome (MS) in a health check-up population aged 12-19 years in Taiwan province.
The study data were supplied by the MJ Health Screening Center, which is a private membership chain clinic with 4 health screening centers around the Taiwan Island and provides periodic health examination to its members. The database included a self-administered questionnaire for health history, asking about demographic, socioeconomic, medical, and lifestyle information, and clinical and laboratory measures for every member. A total of 1629 members (873 boys and 756 girls, respectively) received a health check-up first time at MJ centers were recruited from 2005 to 2006. MS detection rate and agreement rate was calculated according to two definitions, respectively. The distributions of MS components and the aggregation of risk factors were further analyzed.
(1) The range of age-adjusted detection rate of MS for two definitions were 4.05% (5.84% for boys, 1.98% for girls) and 8.35% (10.42% for boys, 5.95% for girls), respectively. It was 0.94% , 14.20% and 36.59% for criterion I among adolescents who were overweight (BMI over 95th percentile), at risk of overweight (BMI between 85th and 95th percentile) and normal weight (BMI below the 85th percentile), respectively; while 3.61%, 25.93% and 53.66% for criterion II. (2) The range of five MS components were 9.09% (low-HDL-C)-16.39% (high blood pressure) for definition I, while 0.98% (high FBG)-27.13% (high WC) for definition II. (3) Of the total subjects, 2.76%, 1.04% and 0.25% were presented with three, four and five MS risk factors for definition I; while 6.69%, 1.60% and 0.34% for definition II, separately. (4) The most common clinical symptom complex of MS was "obesity, hypertension and low-HDL-C" for criterion I, "high TG, obesity and low-HDL-C" for criterion II. (5) The MS diagnostic criterions of I and II were in moderate accordance with agreement rate of 94.35%, Kappa index was 0.518.
Our findings reveal that there were relatively large differences in detection and aggregation of risk components on MS when using two recommended definitions, the detection rate of MS in adolescents depends strongly on the parameters chosen and their respective cut-off points. In order to avoid possible relevant under- or over-estimation of the prevalence, it seems advisable that the use of unversally specific cut-off values seems to be more appropriate to give more reliable results.
比较台湾地区12 - 19岁健康体检人群中两种推荐的代谢综合征(MS)诊断标准的差异。
研究数据由MJ健康筛查中心提供,该中心是一家私立会员连锁诊所,在台湾岛各地有4家健康筛查中心,为其会员提供定期健康检查。数据库包括一份自我管理的健康史问卷,询问人口统计学、社会经济、医疗和生活方式信息,以及每位会员的临床和实验室检查结果。2005年至2006年,共招募了1629名首次在MJ中心接受健康检查的会员(分别为873名男孩和756名女孩)。分别根据两种定义计算MS检出率和符合率。进一步分析MS各组分的分布及危险因素的聚集情况。
(1)两种定义的年龄调整后MS检出率范围分别为4.05%(男孩5.84%,女孩1.98%)和8.35%(男孩10.42%,女孩5.95%)。对于标准I,超重(BMI超过第95百分位数)、超重风险(BMI在第85至95百分位数之间)和正常体重(BMI低于第85百分位数)的青少年中,MS检出率分别为0.94%、14.20%和36.59%;而对于标准II,分别为3.61%、25.93%和53.66%。(2)两种定义下MS的五个组分范围分别为:定义I中9.09%(低HDL-C) - 16.39%(高血压),定义II中0.98%(高FBG) - 27.13%(高WC)。(3)在所有受试者中,标准I下出现3种、4种和5种MS危险因素的比例分别为2.76%、1.04%和0.25%;标准II下分别为6.69%、1.60%和0.34%。(4)标准I中MS最常见的临床症状组合是“肥胖、高血压和低HDL-C”,标准II中是“高TG、肥胖和低HDL-C”。(5)标准I和标准II的MS诊断标准符合率为中度,符合率为94.35%,Kappa指数为0.518。
我们的研究结果表明,使用两种推荐定义时,MS在检出和危险因素聚集方面存在较大差异,青少年MS的检出率很大程度上取决于所选择的参数及其各自的切点。为避免可能对患病率的相关低估或高估,使用普遍适用的特定切点值似乎更合适,以给出更可靠的结果。