Department of Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555, USA.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2009 Winter;8(4):309-15. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-11-0066.
In many life science classrooms, instructors rely upon lecture presentations to efficiently present course content. Students, in this case, act as passive learners with little opportunity to test their knowledge for gaps or misconceptions. The goal of the project described here was to determine whether a collaborative quiz protocol that guided students to discuss their understanding with their peers would improve learning and academic performance. The project took place during a single semester and was composed of two studies: a preliminary study that incorporated short-answer quizzes into the curriculum and a comprehensive study that incorporated short-answer quizzes and justify/explain quizzes in which students were expected to select an answer and then justify or explain it. Students took all quizzes twice, first independently and then collaboratively with classmate(s). Learning was assessed using multiple-choice exam questions based upon quiz topics. Students scored significantly higher on exam questions associated with justify/explain quiz topics than on those associated with short-answer quiz topics.
在许多生命科学教室中,教师依赖于讲座演示来有效地呈现课程内容。在这种情况下,学生充当被动学习者,几乎没有机会测试他们的知识差距或误解。这里描述的项目的目标是确定是否一种协作测验协议,指导学生与同伴讨论他们的理解,将提高学习和学术表现。该项目在一个学期内进行,由两项研究组成:一项初步研究,将简答题纳入课程;一项综合研究,将简答题和论证/解释题纳入课程,要求学生选择一个答案,然后论证或解释。学生两次参加所有测验,第一次是独立完成,然后是与同学合作完成。学习成绩通过基于测验主题的多项选择题进行评估。学生在与论证/解释测验主题相关的考试问题上的得分明显高于与简答题相关的考试问题。