Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Aug;18(8):1059-64. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0952-4. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
Bone tunnel widening poses a problem for graft fixation during revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Large variability exists in the utilization of imaging modalities for evaluating bone tunnels in pre-operative planning for revision ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify the most reliable imaging modality for identifying bone tunnels and assessing tunnel widening, and specifically, to validate the reliability of radiographs, MRI, and CT using intra- and inter-observer testing. Data was retrospectively collected from twelve patients presenting for revision ACL surgery. Five observers twice measured femoral and tibial tunnels at their widest point using digital calipers in coronal and sagittal planes. Measurements were corrected for magnification. Tunnel identification, diameter measurements, and cross-sectional area (CSA) calculations were recorded. A categorical classification of tunnel measurements was created to apply clinical significance to the measurements. Using kappa statistics, intra- and inter-observer reliability testing was performed. CT demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability for tunnel identification. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was significantly less for MRI and radiographs. CT revealed superior reliability versus either radiographs or MRI for CSA analysis. Intra-observer kappa scores for tibial CSA using CT, radiographs, and MRI were 0.66, 0.5, and 0.37, respectively. Inter-observer kappa scores for tibial CSA using CT, radiographs, and MRI were 0.65, 0.39, and 0.32, respectively. Our results demonstrate CT is the most reliable imaging modality for evaluation of ACL bone tunnels as proven by superior intra- and inter-observer testing results when compared to MRI and radiographs. Radiographs and MRI were not reliable, even for simply identifying the presence of a bone tunnel.
骨隧道增宽是前交叉韧带(ACL)重建翻修时移植物固定的一个问题。在 ACL 翻修术前规划中,评估骨隧道时,影像学检查方法的使用存在很大差异。本研究的目的是确定用于识别骨隧道和评估隧道增宽的最可靠影像学检查方法,并特别验证 X 线片、MRI 和 CT 的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。从 12 例接受 ACL 翻修手术的患者中回顾性收集数据。5 名观察者使用数字卡尺在冠状面和矢状面两次测量股骨和胫骨隧道的最宽处。测量结果经过放大校正。记录隧道识别、直径测量和横截面积(CSA)计算。对隧道测量结果进行了分类,以将其应用于临床意义。使用kappa 统计,进行了观察者内和观察者间的可靠性测试。CT 显示在隧道识别方面具有极好的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。MRI 和 X 线片的观察者内和观察者间可靠性显著降低。与 X 线片或 MRI 相比,CT 对 CSA 分析的可靠性更高。使用 CT、X 线片和 MRI 对胫骨 CSA 进行的观察者内kappa 评分分别为 0.66、0.5 和 0.37。使用 CT、X 线片和 MRI 对胫骨 CSA 进行的观察者间 kappa 评分分别为 0.65、0.39 和 0.32。我们的结果表明,CT 是评估 ACL 骨隧道的最可靠影像学方法,与 MRI 和 X 线片相比,其观察者内和观察者间测试结果具有优越性。X 线片和 MRI 甚至无法可靠地识别骨隧道的存在。