Manabe Hiroshi, Yonezawa Kazuya, Kato Takaaki, Toyama Kentaro, Haraguchi Koichi, Ito Takeo
Department of Neurosurgery, Shintoshi Hospital, 331-1 Ishikawa, Hakodate, Hokkaido, 041-0802, Japan.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2010;107:41-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-99373-6_6.
Headache is recognized as one of the specific signs of intracranial arterial dissection (ICrAD). We clarified the incidence of ICrAD in non-emergency outpatients complaining of headache and the nature of headache observed in case of ICrAD.
Consecutive non-emergency outpatients coming to the neurological and neurosurgical departments and who underwent MRI and MRA examinations were included in this study. The diagnosis of ICrAD was made when patients met the following two conditions: (1) pearl-and-string sign, pearl sign, or string sign on MRA, and (2) high arterial wall signal on T1 images or intimal flap on T2 images. If possible, cerebral angiography and/or black blood MRI and/or surface-image MRI was also performed in cases meeting these criteria.
(1) Headache group (172 patients): severe headache was seen in five patients and headache of sudden onset in three. Arterial dissection was diagnosed in eight patients (4.7%, including seven cases of asymptomatic vertebral dissection and one of basilar dissection). The headache noted in most cases of ICrAD was similar to that experienced in daily life. (2) Non-headache group (201 patients): complaints included vertigo/dizziness in 52 patients, gait disturbance in 28, weakness of the arm or leg in 20, and limb numbness in 18, syncope attack in 14, and others in 69. Arterial dissection was diagnosed in six patients (3.0%, including one case of asymptomatic basilar and two of vertebral artery dissection, symptomatic two vertebral and one basilar dissection).
We obtained no evidence of significant difference in the incidence of ICrAD in non-emergency outpatients with (4.7%) and without headache (3.0%). The nature of the headache in the cases of ICrAD was similar to that experienced in daily life. ICrAD with nonspecific headache is more common than previously thought.
头痛被认为是颅内动脉夹层(ICrAD)的特定体征之一。我们明确了在主诉头痛的非急诊门诊患者中ICrAD的发生率以及ICrAD患者所观察到的头痛性质。
本研究纳入了连续前来神经科和神经外科门诊且接受了MRI和MRA检查的非急诊患者。当患者符合以下两个条件时诊断为ICrAD:(1)MRA上出现串珠征、珍珠征或线征,以及(2)T1图像上动脉壁信号增强或T2图像上出现内膜瓣。若可能,对于符合这些标准的病例还进行了脑血管造影和/或黑血MRI和/或表面图像MRI检查。
(1)头痛组(172例患者):5例患者出现严重头痛,3例头痛突然发作。8例患者被诊断为动脉夹层(4.7%,包括7例无症状椎动脉夹层和1例基底动脉夹层)。大多数ICrAD病例中所记录的头痛与日常生活中经历的头痛相似。(2)非头痛组(201例患者):主诉包括52例眩晕/头晕、28例步态障碍、20例手臂或腿部无力、18例肢体麻木、14例晕厥发作以及69例其他症状。6例患者被诊断为动脉夹层(3.0%,包括1例无症状基底动脉夹层和2例椎动脉夹层,2例有症状的椎动脉夹层和1例基底动脉夹层)。
我们没有获得证据表明有头痛(4.7%)和无头痛(3.0%)的非急诊门诊患者中ICrAD的发生率存在显著差异。ICrAD患者头痛的性质与日常生活中经历的头痛相似。伴有非特异性头痛的ICrAD比之前认为的更为常见。