A conflict of interest: why peer review committees need heightened scrutiny under federal antitrust law.
作者信息
Rakestraw Eric
机构信息
Southern Illinois University School of Law, Law Journal Office, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA.
出版信息
J Leg Med. 2009 Oct-Dec;30(4):563-78. doi: 10.1080/01947640903356357.
PMID:19953408
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A conflict of interest: why peer review committees need heightened scrutiny under federal antitrust law.利益冲突：为何同行评审委员会需在联邦反垄断法下接受更严格审查
J Leg Med. 2009 Oct-Dec;30(4):563-78. doi: 10.1080/01947640903356357.
2
To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.审查与否：反垄断责任与同行评审保护
J Health Hosp Law. 1994 Nov;27(11):321-36, 351-2.
3
Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission.医务人员特权与反垄断法：联邦贸易委员会的观点
Med Staff Couns. 1992 Spring;6(2):17-24.
4
Antitrust immunity in Colorado peer review actions.
Hosp Law Newsl. 1989 Dec;7(2):1-5.
5
Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy?
Med World News. 1988 Jun 27;29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7.
6
Current topics in medical staff development and credentialing.医务人员发展与资质认证的当前主题
J Health Hosp Law. 1993 Jul;26(7):193-213, 215.
7
Peer review under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.《医疗保健质量改进法案》下的同行评审
J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Dec;136(12):1737-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0119.
8
Denials of staff privileges face increased antitrust scrutiny.对员工特权的拒绝面临越来越多的反垄断审查。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1992 Fall;17(4):7-15.
9
Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity.检验联邦法律同行评审豁免权范围的法庭案件。
Mod Healthc. 1992 Aug 24;22(34):80.
10
The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1993 Spring;9:419-50.
Zotero 插件