Department of Biology, University of Padova, Italy.
Bioessays. 2010 Jan;32(1):5-8. doi: 10.1002/bies.200900133.
What is a larva, if it is not what survives of an ancestor's adult, compressed into a transient pre-reproductive phase, as suggested by Haeckel's largely disreputed model of evolution by recapitulation? A recently published article hypothesizes that larva and adult of holometabolous insects are developmental expressions of two different genomes coexisting in the same animal as a result of an ancient hybridization event between an onychophoran and a primitive insect with eventless post-embryonic development. More likely, however, larvae originated from late embryonic or early post-embryonic stages of ancestors with direct development. Evolutionary novelties would thus be intercalary rather than terminal, with respect to the ancestor's ontogenetic schedule. This scenario, supported by current research on holometabolous insects and marine invertebrates with complex life cycles, offers a serious alternative to the traditional scenario ('what is early in ontogeny is also early in phylogeny') underlying the current perception of the evolution of genetic regulatory networks.
如果不是海克尔(Haeckel)广为诟病的重演进化模型所暗示的那样,将祖先的成体幸存物压缩成短暂的生殖前阶段,那么幼虫又是什么呢?最近发表的一篇文章假设,完全变态昆虫的幼虫和成虫是由于在无节幼体后发育的原始昆虫和有爪动物之间的古老杂交事件,在同一动物中共存的两个不同基因组的发育表现。然而,更有可能的是,幼虫起源于具有直接发育的祖先的晚期胚胎或早期幼体后阶段。因此,相对于祖先的个体发生时间表,进化的新颖性将是插层的,而不是末端的。这种情况得到了当前对具有复杂生命周期的完全变态昆虫和海洋无脊椎动物的研究的支持,为遗传调控网络进化的当前认识提供了一个严肃的替代方案(“个体发生早期也是系统发生早期”)。