Suppr超能文献

自酸蚀粘结剂在酸蚀釉质表面两年的水降解情况。

Two-year water degradation of self-etching adhesives bonded to bur ground enamel.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):732-40. doi: 10.2341/09-020-L.

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of water storage on the microshear bond strength to ground enamel of three "all-in-one" self-etch adhesives: Futurabond DC, Clearfil S Tri Bond and Hybrid bond; a self-etching primer; Clearfil SE Bond and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system, Admira Bond. Sixty human molars were used. The root of each tooth was removed and the crown was sectioned into two halves. The convex enamel surfaces were reduced by polishing on silicon paper to prepare a flat surface that was roughened with a parallel-sided diamond bur with abundant water for five seconds. The bonding systems were applied on this surface. Prior to adhesive curing, a hollow cylinder (2.0 mm in height/0.75 mm in internal diameter) was placed on the treated surfaces and cured. A resin composite was then inserted into the tube and cured. For each adhesive, two procedures were carried out: A--the specimens were kept in water for 24 hours, then the tube was removed and the microshear bond strength was determined in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute; B--the specimens were stored in water for two-years before microshear testing. The fractured surface of the bonded specimens after each test procedure was examined by SEM. For the 24-hour control, there was no significant difference in bond strength between the tested adhesives. After two years of water storage, the bond strength of Admira Bond, Clearfil SE Bond and Futurabond DC decreased, but the reduction was not significantly different from that of 24 hours. For Clearfil S Tri Bond and Hybrid Bond, the bond strengths were significantly reduced compared to their 24-hour results.

摘要

为了评估三种“一体化”自酸蚀粘结剂(Futurabond DC、Clearfil S Tri Bond 和 Hybrid bond)、自酸蚀底胶 Clearfil SE Bond 和酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂系统 Admira Bond 在水储存条件下对釉牙本质微拉伸粘结强度的影响,使用了 60 个人类磨牙。每个牙齿的根部被切除,牙冠被切成两半。用硅纸抛光牙冠的凸面釉质,使其表面变平,然后用带有大量水的平行边钻石锉将其表面粗化 5 秒钟。将粘结系统应用于该表面。在粘结剂固化之前,将一个空心圆柱(高 2.0mm,内径 0.75mm)放置在处理过的表面上并固化。然后将树脂复合材料插入管中并固化。对于每种粘结剂,进行了两个程序:A--将样本在水中保存 24 小时,然后去除管,在万能试验机上以 0.5mm/min 的十字头速度测定微拉伸粘结强度;B--在微拉伸测试前将样本储存在水中两年。在每次测试程序后,通过 SEM 检查粘结样本的断裂表面。对于 24 小时对照组,测试粘结剂的粘结强度没有显著差异。在水储存两年后,Admira Bond、Clearfil SE Bond 和 Futurabond DC 的粘结强度降低,但与 24 小时相比,降低不显著。对于 Clearfil S Tri Bond 和 Hybrid Bond,与 24 小时结果相比,粘结强度显著降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验