Han Guo-Hong, Meng Xiang-Jie, Yin Zhan-Xin, Wang Jian-Hong, He Chuang-Ye, Liang Jie, Guo Xue-Gang, Liu Jie, Ding Lie, Wu Kai-Chun, Fan Dai-Ming
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jun 9;89(22):1549-52.
To evaluate retrospectively the feasibility, efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or percutaneous transhepatic or transsplenic approach to the portal vein with the combination of TIPS for the treatment of patients with portal vein thrombosis with or without cavernous transformation.
Sixty-five patients with portal vein thrombosis from July 2002 to August 2007 at our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Indirect portography through superior mesenteric artery was performed to determine the approaches for TIPS procedure. If the intrahepatic portal vein branches were visualized, TIPS was implemented directly from transjugular approach; if the intrahepatic portal vein branches failed to be visualized, an ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic or transsplenic approach was performed to recanalize the thrombosed portal vein initially followed by TIPS placement to reconstruct the portal venous flow. Efficacy and complications were observed and revision and survival rates monitored during the follow-up.
TIPS were successfully created in 54 of 65 patients with portal vein thrombosis with a success rate of 83.1%. Among them, TIPS were performed directly in 36 of 40 patients; portal vein recanalization were successfully performed via transhepatic access in 15 of 25 patients, and 3 of remaining 5 who failed the transhepatic approach were successfully done from transsplenic access. Then TIPS placement was accomplished with a success rate of 72.0% (18/25). The success rate in cirrhotic patients was 82.4% (42/51) and it was not significant different from those without cirrhosis 85.7% (12/14) (P = 0.766). While the success rate in the patients with cavernous transformation 71.8% (28/39) showed a significant difference compared to that without cavernous transformation 100% (26/26) (P = 0.002). The success rates in portal vein thrombosis and cavernous transformation with or without cirrhosis were 42.9% (18/42) and 83.3% (10/12) respectively, exhibiting a significant difference (P = 0.021). The mortality rate of 30 days post-operation was 3.7% (2/54). From Day 1 to 63 months follow-up, The incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy was 27.8% (15/54); revision rate 22.2% (12/54); median survival time 31.4 months.
Conventional TIPS or percutaneous transhepatic or transsplenic approach combined with TIPS for the treatment of portal vein thrombosis with or without cavernous transformation are feasible, safe and effective. It is essential to recanalize the thrombosed portal vein initially followed by TIPS placement to reconstruct the portal venous flow.
回顾性评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)或经皮经肝或经脾门静脉入路联合TIPS治疗门静脉血栓形成伴或不伴海绵样变患者的可行性、有效性和安全性。
回顾性分析2002年7月至2007年8月在我院就诊的65例门静脉血栓形成患者。通过肠系膜上动脉进行间接门静脉造影,以确定TIPS手术的入路。如果肝内门静脉分支显影,则经颈静脉直接实施TIPS;如果肝内门静脉分支未显影,则先行超声引导下经皮经肝或经脾入路再通血栓形成的门静脉,随后放置TIPS以重建门静脉血流。观察疗效和并发症,并在随访期间监测翻修率和生存率。
65例门静脉血栓形成患者中54例成功建立TIPS,成功率为83.1%。其中,40例患者直接进行TIPS;25例患者中15例经肝入路成功再通门静脉,其余5例经肝入路失败的患者中有3例经脾入路成功。然后完成TIPS置入,成功率为72.0%(18/25)。肝硬化患者的成功率为82.4%(42/51),与非肝硬化患者的85.7%(12/14)无显著差异(P = 0.766)。而海绵样变患者的成功率为71.8%(28/39),与无海绵样变患者的100%(26/26)相比有显著差异(P = 0.002)。门静脉血栓形成伴或不伴肝硬化以及海绵样变患者的成功率分别为42.9%(18/42)和83.3%(10/12),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.021)。术后30天死亡率为3.7%(2/54)。从术后第1天至63个月随访,肝性脑病发生率为27.8%(15/54);翻修率为22.2%(12/54);中位生存时间为31.4个月。
传统TIPS或经皮经肝或经脾入路联合TIPS治疗门静脉血栓形成伴或不伴海绵样变是可行、安全和有效的。首先再通血栓形成的门静脉,随后放置TIPS以重建门静脉血流至关重要。