Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成并出现症状性门静脉高压。

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal vein thrombosis with symptomatic portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis.

机构信息

Department of Liver Disease, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2011 Jan;54(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.029. Epub 2010 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Data on the management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis are extremely limited, particularly in the cases of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). We assessed the outcome of TIPS for PVT in patients with cirrhosis and symptomatic portal hypertension and determined the predictors of technical success and survival.

METHODS

In the retrospective study, 57 consecutive patients receiving TIPS were enrolled between December 2001 and September 2008. All were diagnosed with chronic PVT, and 30 had portal cavernoma. Indications for TIPS were variceal hemorrhage (n = 56) and refractory ascites (n = 1).

RESULTS

TIPS were successfully placed in 75% of patients (43/57). The independent predictors of technical success included portal cavernoma, and the degree of thrombosis within the main portal vein (MPV), the portal vein branches, and the superior mesenteric vein. Only one patient died of severe procedure-related complication. The cumulative 1-year shunt dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy rates were 21% and 25%, respectively. The cumulative 1- and 5-year variceal re-bleeding rates differed significantly between the TIPS success and failure groups (10% and 28% versus 43% and 100%, respectively; p = 0.0004), while the cumulative 1- and 5-year survival rates were similar between the two groups (86% and 77% versus 78% and 62%, respectively; p = 0.34). The independent predictor of survival in PVT patients with decompensated cirrhosis was the degree of MPV occlusion (hazard ratio 0.189, 95% CI 0.042-0.848).

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS should be considered a safe and feasible alternative therapy for chronic PVT in selected patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Both technical success and survival were closely associated with the degree of MPV occlusion.

摘要

背景与目的

代偿期肝硬化患者门静脉血栓(PVT)的管理数据极为有限,尤其是经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的情况。我们评估了 TIPS 治疗肝硬化和有症状门脉高压合并 PVT 患者的结果,并确定了技术成功和生存的预测因素。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们于 2001 年 12 月至 2008 年 9 月期间纳入了 57 例接受 TIPS 的连续患者。所有患者均被诊断为慢性 PVT,其中 30 例存在门静脉海绵样变。TIPS 的适应证为静脉曲张出血(n=56)和难治性腹水(n=1)。

结果

75%(43/57)的患者成功放置了 TIPS。技术成功的独立预测因素包括门静脉海绵样变,以及主门静脉(MPV)、门静脉分支和肠系膜上静脉内血栓的程度。仅有 1 例患者死于严重的与手术相关的并发症。1 年时的分流功能障碍和肝性脑病发生率分别为 21%和 25%。TIPS 成功和失败组的 1 年和 5 年静脉曲张再出血率差异有统计学意义(分别为 10%和 28%比 43%和 100%;p=0.0004),而两组的 1 年和 5 年生存率相似(分别为 86%和 77%比 78%和 62%;p=0.34)。在失代偿期肝硬化合并 PVT 患者中,生存的独立预测因素是 MPV 闭塞程度(风险比 0.189,95%CI 0.042-0.848)。

结论

TIPS 应被视为治疗失代偿期肝硬化合并慢性 PVT 的一种安全且可行的替代疗法。技术成功和生存均与 MPV 闭塞程度密切相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验