San Luigi Gonzaga Faculty of Medicine of the Turin University, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Italy.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;87(2):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.021. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
Since there is no agreement on regimens of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in type 2 diabetes not on insulin, we evaluated the effects of a simple SMBG policy taking into account compliance.
273 type 2 diabetic patients not on insulin with HbA1c >7% attending our Diabetes Clinic and already using SMBG were randomized as follows: Group A, one BG profile/month with fasting and post-prandial values; Group B, one BG profile every 2 weeks with pre- and post-prandial values. Patients were followed-up by the same team every 3 months with the same education and treatment policies. At 3 and 6 months, SMBG profiles were evaluated and HbA1c measured. SMBG was carried out as recommended by 73% of Group A and 44% of Group B patients. In compliant patients, HbA1c and BG were unchanged in Group A whereas in Group B fasting, pre-prandial and two out of three post-prandial BG values were reduced and HbA1c decreased from 8.09+/-0.84% to 7.60+/-0.73% (p<0.001). The influence on BG control was similar for the two policies when compliance was not considered.
The more intensive SMBG policy considered is associated with improvements in glycaemic control in compliant subjects.
由于对于未使用胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者自我血糖监测(SMBG)方案尚未达成一致,因此我们评估了考虑到依从性的简单 SMBG 策略的效果。
273 名 HbA1c>7%且正在使用 SMBG 的未使用胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者在我们的糖尿病诊所接受了随机分组:A 组,每月进行一次血糖谱检测,包含空腹和餐后值;B 组,每两周进行一次血糖谱检测,包含餐前和餐后值。所有患者在 3 个月时由同一团队进行随访,接受相同的教育和治疗方案。在 3 个月和 6 个月时,评估 SMBG 图谱并测量 HbA1c。A 组有 73%的患者和 B 组有 44%的患者按建议进行了 SMBG。在依从性良好的患者中,A 组的 HbA1c 和 BG 没有变化,而 B 组的空腹、餐前和餐后两小时的 BG 值均降低,HbA1c 从 8.09±0.84%降至 7.60±0.73%(p<0.001)。不考虑依从性时,两种方案对 BG 控制的影响相似。
在依从性良好的患者中,更强化的 SMBG 策略与血糖控制的改善相关。