Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty.

CONCLUSION

In this comparative series, hearing results were superior with titanium compared with autograft ossiculoplasty in the absence of a stapes superstructure. However, in the presence of a stapes superstructure, titanium ossiculoplasties gave superior results to autografts only when comparing an air-bone gap of < 10 dB.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the hearing outcomes of autograft versus titanium ossiculoplasty at 1 year.

METHODS

Two consecutive groups of patients with chronic suppurative otitis media with and without cholesteatoma suitable for ossiculoplasty, either primarily or as a staged procedure, were recruited for the study. A total of 52 consecutive patients who underwent an autograft ossiculoplasty were compared with 51 consecutive patients who underwent a titanium ossiculoplasty. Hearing results were statistically compared at 1 year between the two groups using the four frequency average (FFA) of 0.5/1/2/4 kHz and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) four frequency average of 0.5/1/2/3 kHz. The results were analysed statistically.

RESULTS

A statistically significant number of titanium TORP ossiculoplasties achieved an air-bone gap closure to within < 20 dB compared with the autograft equivalent group (p = 0.039 FFA; p = 0.016 AAO-HNS). The number of titanium PORP ossiculoplasties achieving an air-bone gap closure to within < 10 dB compared with the autograft equivalent group was also statistically significant (p = 0.006 FFA; p = 0.002 AAO-HNS).