Department of Otolaryngology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009 Nov-Dec;23(6):619-21. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3364.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility of endoscopic anterior ethmoid artery (AEA) ligation for acute control of epistaxis.
A prospective study was conducted using eight cadaver heads. Pre- and intraoperative CT scans were performed using the xCAT (Xoran Technologies, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI). Skull base anatomy relative to the AEA was reviewed preoperatively. Endoscopic AEA ligation was attempted in all sides with a mesentery. Ligation was not deemed feasible in AEAs without a mesentery. It was attempted on two sides without a mesentery to assess risk of skull base and orbital disruption. Intraoperative CT scans were performed to assess the position of the clips and the integrity of the skull base and lamina papyracea.
The mean lateral lamella height was 4.75 and 4.83 mm on the right and left, respectively. Of the 16 arteries, 6 (37.5%) of the AEAs were within a bony mesentery. No AEA canals were dehiscent. Four of the six AEAs (66%) within a mesentery were successfully clipped and two (33%) were partially clipped by endoscopic evaluation. Both arteries without mesentery where clipping was attempted were partially clipped by endoscopic examination. Review of intraoperative CT scans showed that the AEA with a mesentery was clipped successfully on three sides, partially on one side, and unsuccessfully on two sides. AEA clipping was unsuccessful on both sides without a mesentery. One AEA without a mesentery showed skull base disruption after ligation by endoscopy and CT. None of the specimens showed orbital injury.
Intraoperative CT scanning revealed that AEA ligation was less successful than was apparent endoscopically. Effective AEA clipping was performed in 50% of cases with a mesentery. Endoscopic clipping was not technically feasible in cases with AEA without a mesentery. Overall, AEA clipping was only technically feasible in 3 of 16 sides (18.8%).
本研究旨在评估内镜下前筛动脉(AEA)结扎术治疗急性鼻出血的技术可行性。
采用前瞻性研究,使用 8 个头骨标本。在 xCAT(Xoran Technologies,Inc.,密歇根州安阿伯)上进行术前和术中 CT 扫描。术前评估 AEA 与颅底解剖结构的关系。所有标本均尝试在内镜下用肠系膜结扎 AEA,但没有肠系膜的 AEA 则认为不可结扎。在没有肠系膜的情况下,我们尝试在两侧进行结扎,以评估颅底和眶部破裂的风险。术中 CT 扫描评估夹的位置以及颅底和纸样板的完整性。
右侧和左侧的平均外侧鼻甲高度分别为 4.75 和 4.83mm。16 条动脉中,6 条(37.5%)AEA 位于骨系膜内。没有发现 AEA 管有缺损。在系膜内的 6 条 AEA 中有 4 条(66%)成功夹闭,2 条(33%)通过内镜评估部分夹闭。在尝试夹闭的两条无系膜的动脉中,内镜检查显示均部分夹闭。术中 CT 扫描显示,在 3 侧成功夹闭了带有系膜的 AEA,在 1 侧部分夹闭,在 2 侧不成功夹闭。在没有系膜的情况下,双侧 AEA 结扎均不成功。1 条无系膜的 AEA 在通过内镜和 CT 结扎后显示颅底破裂。所有标本均未显示眶部损伤。
术中 CT 扫描显示,AEA 结扎的效果不如内镜下明显。带有系膜的标本中,有 50%可以有效夹闭 AEA。在没有系膜的情况下,内镜夹闭在技术上不可行。总体而言,在 16 侧标本中,仅 3 侧(18.8%)在技术上可行进行 AEA 夹闭。