Heart Rhythm Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Dec;6(12 Suppl):S50-63. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) ablation, with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation, has proven highly successful for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation but has limited success in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent (P-LSP) AF. A set of linear left atrial (LA) lesions has been added to interrupt some macroreentrant components of P-LSP AF. This includes a Transverse Roof Line and Left Fibrous Trigone Line (from Roof Line to mitral annulus at the left fibrous trigone). With complete conduction block (CCB), these lesions should prevent single- or double-loop macroreentrant LA tachycardias from propagating around the PVs or mitral annulus. It is critical to identify whether CCB has been achieved and, if not, to locate the gap for further ablation, since residual gaps will support macroreentrant atrial tachycardias. Confirming CCB involves pacing close to one side of the ablation line and determining the direction of activation on the opposite side, by recording close bipolar electrograms at multiple paired sites (perpendicular and close to the ablation line) along the entire length of the line. Simpler approaches have been used, but all have limitations, especially when the conduction time across a gap is long. The extended lesion set was created after PV isolation and GP ablation in 14 patients with P-LSP AF. Mapping after the first set of radiofrequency applications for the Transverse Roof and Left Trigone Lines confirmed CCB in only 3/14 (21%) patients for each line, showing the importance of checking for CCB. During follow-up (median 8 months), 10/14 (71%) patients had no symptoms of atrial arrhythmia (7/10 off antiarrhythmic drugs). Of the remaining four patients, three have only infrequent episodes (self-terminating in 2/3). These preliminary results suggest that adding Roof and Trigone Lines may increase MIS success in patients with P-LSP AF. Accurate mapping techniques verify CCB and effectively locate gaps in ablation lines for further ablation.
微创外科 (MIS) 消融术,包括肺静脉 (PV) 隔离和神经节丛 (GP) 消融术,已被证明对阵发性心房颤动非常有效,但在持续性和长期持续性 (P-LSP) AF 患者中的成功率有限。一组线性左心房 (LA) 病变已被添加到中断一些 P-LSP AF 的大折返成分中。这包括一条横膈膜屋顶线和左纤维三角线(从屋顶线到左纤维三角的二尖瓣环)。通过完全传导阻断 (CCB),这些病变应防止单环或双环大折返 LA 心动过速围绕 PV 或二尖瓣环传播。确定是否已实现 CCB 并在未实现时定位进一步消融的间隙至关重要,因为残留间隙将支持大折返性心房心动过速。确认 CCB 涉及在消融线的一侧附近起搏,并通过在整个线的全长上的多个配对部位(垂直且靠近消融线)记录接近双极电图来确定对侧的激活方向。已经使用了更简单的方法,但所有方法都有局限性,尤其是当间隙中的传导时间较长时。在 14 例 P-LSP AF 患者进行 PV 隔离和 GP 消融后创建了扩展病变组。在第一次进行横膈膜屋顶和左三角线的射频应用后进行映射,仅在 3/14(21%)患者中确认了每条线的 CCB,表明检查 CCB 的重要性。在随访期间(中位数 8 个月),14 例患者中有 10 例(71%)无房性心律失常症状(10 例停药)。其余 4 例患者中,有 3 例仅有偶发发作(2/3 例自行终止)。这些初步结果表明,在 P-LSP AF 患者中添加屋顶和三角线可能会增加 MIS 的成功率。准确的映射技术可验证 CCB,并有效地定位消融线中的间隙以进行进一步消融。