Tsugayasu Rie, Handa Toshiyuki, Kaneko Yuzuru, Ichinohe Tatsuya
Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;68(3):590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.034. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of intravenous midazolam and propofol sedation on autonomic nervous activities during psychological stress, and whether these results are associated with changes in subjective stress feelings.
Seven healthy male volunteers were included in a randomized crossover manner. The heart rate (HR), HR variability, arterial oxygen saturation, and bispectral index value were continuously monitored. A mental arithmetic task for 7 minutes was given with or without intravenous sedation with midazolam or propofol. A bispectral index value of 75 to 85 and an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score of 4 were the targeted sedation level in both groups. HR variability was assessed using the power spectral analysis (low-frequency [LF] and high-frequency [HF] components and LF/HF ratio). The faces anxiety scale was used to grade their stress feelings after each mental arithmetic task.
During the mental arithmetic task with intravenous sedation, no differences were found in the bispectral index values, arterial oxygen saturation, or the results of the mental arithmetic task between the 2 groups. The HR, LF/HF ratio, and normalized unit LF increased, and the normalized unit HF decreased in both groups. However, the percentage of changes in LF/HF ratio, normalized unit LF, and normalized unit HF were smaller in the midazolam group. In addition, the reduction in faces anxiety scale was greater in the midazolam group.
These results suggest that midazolam more effectively suppresses sympathetic nervous activation and reduces subjective stress feelings during a mental arithmetic task than propofol.
本研究旨在探讨静脉注射咪达唑仑和丙泊酚镇静对心理应激期间自主神经活动的影响,以及这些结果是否与主观应激感受的变化相关。
7名健康男性志愿者以随机交叉方式纳入研究。持续监测心率(HR)、HR变异性、动脉血氧饱和度和脑电双频指数值。在有或没有静脉注射咪达唑仑或丙泊酚镇静的情况下,给予7分钟的心算任务。两组的目标镇静水平均为脑电双频指数值75至85以及观察者警觉/镇静评分4分。使用功率谱分析(低频[LF]和高频[HF]成分以及LF/HF比值)评估HR变异性。在心算任务结束后,使用面部焦虑量表对他们的应激感受进行评分。
在静脉镇静的心算任务期间,两组之间的脑电双频指数值、动脉血氧饱和度或心算任务结果均未发现差异。两组的HR、LF/HF比值和归一化单位LF均升高,归一化单位HF降低。然而,咪达唑仑组的LF/HF比值、归一化单位LF和归一化单位HF的变化百分比更小。此外,咪达唑仑组的面部焦虑量表评分降低幅度更大。
这些结果表明,在执行心算任务期间,咪达唑仑比丙泊酚更有效地抑制交感神经激活并减轻主观应激感受。