• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

征收豪车医保可能会产生雪佛兰的效果。

Taxing cadillac health plans may produce Chevy results.

机构信息

National Opinion Research Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):174-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2008.0430. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2008.0430
PMID:19959542
Abstract

It's often assumed that high-cost health insurance plans--sometimes called "Cadillac" plans--provide rich benefits to plan subscribers. Health reform provisions that treat these plans like luxuries may be misguided. Only 3.7 percent of variation in the cost of family coverage can be explained by benefit design (actuarial value). Benefit design plus plan type (HMO, PPO, POS, or high-deductible plans) explains 6.1 percent of this variation. Industry type and medical costs in the region also play a role. Most variation in premiums, however, remains largely unexplained.

摘要

人们通常认为,高成本的健康保险计划——有时被称为“凯迪拉克”计划——为计划参保人提供丰厚的福利。将这些计划视为奢侈品的医疗改革条款可能存在误导。家庭保险费用的变化只有 3.7%可以用福利设计(精算值)来解释。福利设计加上计划类型(HMO、PPO、POS 或高免赔额计划)可以解释 6.1%的这种变化。行业类型和该地区的医疗费用也起了作用。然而,保费的大部分变化仍然很大程度上无法解释。

相似文献

1
Taxing cadillac health plans may produce Chevy results.征收豪车医保可能会产生雪佛兰的效果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):174-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2008.0430. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
2
Group insurance: a better deal for most people than individual plans.团体保险:对大多数人来说比个人计划更划算。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):156-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0060. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
3
'Cadillac' feedback. Tax on most generous insurance plans draws ire.“凯迪拉克”式反馈。对最慷慨保险计划征税引发愤怒。
Mod Healthc. 2009 Oct 5;39(40):8-9.
4
Power to the patient: can high-deductible plans and health savings accounts lower premium costs and replace the traditional goal of comprehensive insurance?患者的力量:高额免赔额保险计划和健康储蓄账户能否降低保费成本并取代传统的全面保险目标?
State Legis. 2006 May;32(5):24-5.
5
Check the right box. Credits or deductions? The three main presidential candidates take varying stances on adjusting tax code regarding insurance.勾选正确的方框。增税还是减税?三位主要总统候选人在调整与保险相关的税法问题上持不同立场。
Mod Healthc. 2008 Apr 14;38(15):6-7, 16, 1.
6
Dual choice health insurance policy: a proposal and a cost analysis.双重选择健康保险政策:一项提议及成本分析。
J Health Care Finance. 2009 Winter;36(2):60-70.
7
Small businesses' changing views on health reform.小企业对医疗改革的不断变化的看法。
J Am Health Policy. 1993 Sep-Oct;3(5):6-14.
8
What high-deductible plans look like: findings from a national survey of employers, 2005.高免赔额保险计划的现状:2005年全国雇主调查结果
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-434-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.434.
9
Employer-sponsored health insurance and health reform.雇主提供的医疗保险与医疗改革。
Natl Bur Econ Res Bull Aging Health. 2009(2):2-3.
10
Clinton's master plan. Final decisions on health reform: how much it will cost and who pays.克林顿的总体规划。医疗改革的最终决策:成本几何以及由谁支付。
US News World Rep. 1993 May 24;114(20):22-4, 26, 28.