• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类线索诱发药物摄取的联想基础。

The associative basis of cue-elicited drug taking in humans.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG72RD, UK.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Feb;208(3):337-51. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1735-9. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00213-009-1735-9
PMID:19960187
Abstract

RATIONALE

Drug cues play an important role in motivating human drug taking, lapse and relapse, but the psychological basis of this effect has not been fully specified.

METHOD

To clarify these mechanisms, the study measured the extent to which pictorial and conditioned tobacco cues enhanced smoking topography in an ad libitum smoking session simultaneously with cue effects on subjective craving, pleasure and anxiety.

RESULTS

Both cue types increased the number of puffs consumed and craving, but pleasure and anxiety responses were dissociated across cue type. Moreover, cue effects on puff number correlated with effects on craving but not pleasure or anxiety. Finally, whereas overall puff number and craving declined across the two blocks of consumption, consistent with burgeoning satiety, cue enhancement of puff number and craving were both unaffected by satiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the data suggest that cue-elicited drug taking in humans is mediated by an expectancy-based associative learning architecture, which paradoxically is autonomous of the current incentive value of the drug.

摘要

原理

药物线索在激发人类药物使用、失误和复吸方面起着重要作用,但这一效应的心理基础尚未得到充分说明。

方法

为了阐明这些机制,该研究在自由吸烟期间同时测量了图片和条件性烟草线索在多大程度上增强了吸烟状态,同时还测量了线索对主观渴望、愉悦和焦虑的影响。

结果

两种线索类型都增加了吸烟量和渴望感,但愉悦和焦虑反应在线索类型之间存在差异。此外,吸烟量与渴望感的关联与吸烟量与愉悦或焦虑的关联不同。最后,尽管整体吸烟量和渴望感在两个吸烟阶段都下降了,这与饱腹感的增加一致,但吸烟量和渴望感的线索增强都不受饱腹感的影响。

结论

总的来说,这些数据表明,人类线索诱发的药物使用是由基于期望的联想学习结构介导的,这种结构与药物的当前激励价值相反是自主的。

相似文献

1
The associative basis of cue-elicited drug taking in humans.人类线索诱发药物摄取的联想基础。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Feb;208(3):337-51. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1735-9. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
Does smoking cue-induced craving tell us anything important about nicotine dependence?吸烟线索诱发的渴求能告诉我们关于尼古丁依赖的什么重要信息吗?
Addiction. 2009 Oct;104(10):1610-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02550.x. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
3
An acute dose of nicotine enhances cue-induced cocaine craving.急性剂量的尼古丁会增强线索诱导的可卡因渴望。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998 Jan 1;49(2):95-104. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00144-0.
4
Severity of nicotine dependence modulates cue-induced brain activity in regions involved in motor preparation and imagery.尼古丁依赖的严重程度会调节参与运动准备和想象的脑区中线索诱导的大脑活动。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):577-88. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0080-x. Epub 2005 Aug 13.
5
Effects of topiramate on cue-induced cigarette craving and the response to a smoked cigarette in briefly abstinent smokers.托吡酯对近期戒烟者线索诱导的吸烟渴望及对吸燃烟反应的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 May;192(1):147-58. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0755-6. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
6
Severity of dependence modulates smokers' neuronal cue reactivity and cigarette craving elicited by tobacco advertisement.依赖严重程度调节吸烟者对烟草广告引起的神经元线索反应和吸烟渴求。
Addict Biol. 2011 Jan;16(1):166-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00207.x.
7
Craving, cue reactivity, and stimulus control among early-stage young smokers: effects of smoking intensity and gender.早期年轻吸烟者的渴求、线索反应和刺激控制:吸烟强度和性别影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Feb;16(2):208-15. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt147. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
8
Nicotine dependence, "background" and cue-induced craving and smoking in the laboratory.尼古丁依赖、“背景”以及实验室中线索诱导的渴望和吸烟行为。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Sep 1;142:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
9
Combined Smoking Cues Enhance Reactivity and Predict Immediate Subsequent Smoking.联合吸烟线索增强反应性并预测即刻后续吸烟。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 4;21(2):241-248. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty009.
10
Cue exposure treatment in a virtual environment to reduce nicotine craving: a functional MRI study.在虚拟环境中进行线索暴露疗法以减少尼古丁渴望:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Feb;12(1):43-5. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0032.

引用本文的文献

1
Value signals guiding choices for cannabis versus non-drug rewards in people who use cannabis near-daily.价值信号指导近日常用大麻者在大麻与非毒品奖励之间做出选择。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Apr;242(4):681-691. doi: 10.1007/s00213-025-06746-6. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
Modifying Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer by approach avoidance training in healthy subjects: a proof of concept study.在健康受试者中通过趋近回避训练来改变巴甫洛夫到工具的转移:概念验证研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 21;13(1):10074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37083-3.
3
Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional bias is associated with incentive-related physiological and subjective measures.注意偏向与动机相关的生理和主观测量指标有关。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Aug;17(4):247-57. doi: 10.1037/a0016658.
2
Responses to smoking cues are relevant to smoking and relapse.对吸烟提示的反应与吸烟及复吸相关。
Addiction. 2009 Oct;104(10):1617-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02580.x. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
3
The continuing conundrum of craving.渴望这一持续存在的难题。
特定食物反应抑制训练的显性和隐性贬值效应
J Cogn. 2023 Jan 17;6(1):10. doi: 10.5334/joc.256. eCollection 2023.
4
Subliminal determinants of cue-guided choice.潜意识线索引导的选择决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 17;10(1):11926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68926-y.
5
Does acute stress influence the Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer effect? Implications for substance use disorders.急性应激是否会影响巴甫洛夫到工具性转移效应?对物质使用障碍的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Aug;237(8):2305-2316. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05534-8. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
6
Effects of dose on acquisition and persistence of a new response for a remifentanil-associated stimulus.剂量对瑞芬太尼相关刺激新反应的习得和持续性的影响。
Behav Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;31(2&3):207-215. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000550.
7
Individual differences in working memory capacity and cue-guided behavior in humans.个体在工作记忆容量和线索引导行为上的差异。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 13;9(1):7327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43860-w.
8
Goal-Directed and Habitual Control in Smokers.吸烟者的目标导向和习惯性控制。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Feb 6;22(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz001.
9
Tension reduction and affect regulation: An examination of mood indices on drinking and non-drinking days among university student drinkers.紧张缓解与情绪调节:对大学生饮酒者饮酒日和非饮酒日情绪指标的考察。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Aug;26(4):377-390. doi: 10.1037/pha0000210. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
Combined Smoking Cues Enhance Reactivity and Predict Immediate Subsequent Smoking.联合吸烟线索增强反应性并预测即刻后续吸烟。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 4;21(2):241-248. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty009.
Addiction. 2009 Oct;104(10):1618-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02588.x. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
4
Does smoking cue-induced craving tell us anything important about nicotine dependence?吸烟线索诱发的渴求能告诉我们关于尼古丁依赖的什么重要信息吗?
Addiction. 2009 Oct;104(10):1610-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02550.x. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
5
The propositional nature of human associative learning.人类联想学习的命题性质。
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Apr;32(2):183-98; discussion 198-246. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000855.
6
Associative theories of goal-directed behaviour: a case for animal-human translational models.目标导向行为的联想理论:动物-人类转化模型的一个实例
Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):463-76. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0230-6. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
7
Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding).基于TEC(事件编码理论)的动作控制。
Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):512-26. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Detection versus sustained attention to drug cues have dissociable roles in mediating drug seeking behavior.对药物线索的检测与持续注意在介导觅药行为中具有可分离的作用。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Feb;17(1):21-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014957.
9
Decision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain.决策理论、强化学习与大脑。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):429-53. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.429.
10
Parallel and interactive learning processes within the basal ganglia: relevance for the understanding of addiction.基底神经节内的平行和交互式学习过程:对理解成瘾的意义。
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Apr 12;199(1):89-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.027. Epub 2008 Oct 4.