Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Pain. 2010 Feb;11(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
Recent developments in clinical, cognitive, and behavioral sciences as well as in social neuroscience can provide new perspectives on our understanding of different forms of pain expression and the social reactions of observers to various types of pain expression. Studies indicate that pain expression is governed by both automatic (unintentional, reflexive) and controlled (intentional, purposive) neuroregulatory systems. Reciprocal mechanisms in observers responsible for automatic (unintentional, reflexive) and controlled (intentional, reflective) reactions also are important. Observers appear more likely to display immediate "visceral" emotional reactions to unintentional, reflexive expression, whereas controlled expression characterized by purposive behavior appears more likely to elicit reflection on the nature and origins of the person's pain. This review summarizes research within the context of a theoretical model for understanding how pain is perceived in others.
People attempting to understand another person's pain may have access to the person's spontaneous behavioral reaction as well as verbal report and other purposive communications. The former instigates reflexive and emotional reactions, whereas the latter tends to be perceived as confounding expression of experience with response to situational demands.
最近在临床、认知和行为科学以及社会神经科学方面的发展,可以为我们理解不同形式的疼痛表达以及观察者对各种类型的疼痛表达的社会反应提供新的视角。研究表明,疼痛表达受自动(无意识、反射性)和控制(有意、有目的)神经调节系统的共同支配。观察者中负责自动(无意识、反射性)和控制(有意、反射性)反应的互惠机制也很重要。观察者似乎更容易对无意识、反射性的表达立即产生“内脏”情绪反应,而以有目的行为为特征的控制性表达则更有可能引发对他人疼痛性质和来源的思考。这篇综述总结了在理解他人疼痛的理论模型框架内进行的研究。
试图理解他人疼痛的人可能可以获得这个人的自发性行为反应,以及言语报告和其他有目的的交流。前者引发反射性和情绪反应,而后者则往往被视为将体验的表达与对情境需求的反应混淆在一起。