Demiris George
Clinical Informatics and Patient Centered Technologies Program at the School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:4311-4. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333800.
Two distinct approaches to smart home design, namely Distributed Direct Sensing (DDS) and Infrastructure Mediated Sensing (IMS), have distinguishing features and implications resulting from their implementation. These two distinct smart home approaches have not been directly compared pertaining to their technical performance or their acceptance by the end users. It is also unclear what the perceived privacy and obtrusiveness concerns are when it comes to the implementation of these two different approaches in homes. The study presented here aimed to evaluate acceptance of these two sensing approaches by older adults and assess the perceived privacy and obtrusiveness concerns and ultimately define their social implications.
智能家居设计有两种不同的方法，即分布式直接传感（DDS）和基础设施介导传感（IMS），它们在实施过程中具有不同的特点和影响。这两种不同的智能家居方法在技术性能或终端用户的接受度方面尚未进行直接比较。对于在家庭中实施这两种不同方法时所感知到的隐私和干扰问题也不清楚。本文提出的研究旨在评估老年人对这两种传感方法的接受度，评估所感知到的隐私和干扰问题，并最终确定它们的社会影响。
