Roman L Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, USDA-ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;88(3):1160-7. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2544. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
Longissimus thoracis steaks from steers (n = 464) with 0 to 50% inheritance of Angus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Hereford, Limousin, Red Angus, and Simmental were evaluated during 6 d of display to assess genetic contributions to color stability. Color space values [CIE L* (lightness), a* (redness), b* (yellowness)], chroma, color change (DeltaE), and surface metmyoglobin (K/S 572/525) were determined on d 0 and 6 of display. Myoglobin concentration was highly heritable (0.85), but ultimate pH was weakly heritable (0.06). Day 0 L* values were moderately heritable (0.24). Variation in metmyoglobin, L*, and DeltaE on d 6 was moderately explained by genetic factors (41, 40, and 29%, respectively). Change during display was moderately heritable for a* (0.31), b* (0.23), chroma (0.35), and surface metmyoglobin (0.29). At the start of display, Angus steaks had greater (P < 0.05) L* values than those from all breeds except Charolais. On d 6, Angus steaks had greater (P < 0.05) L* (50.0) values than Gelbvieh, Hereford, and Simmental steaks (46.1, 44.0, and 44.5, respectively). Day 0 values for a*, b*, chroma, and DeltaE were not affected by breed (P > 0.05). On d 6, a* values were greater (P < 0.05) for Charolais and Limousin steaks (31.1 and 30.5) than Angus, Hereford, and Red Angus steaks (27.4, 27.7, and 26.3, respectively). Thus, a* changed less (P < 0.05) in Charolais and Limousin steaks (1.8 and 2.6, respectively) vs. steaks from other breeds. Day 6 b* values were greater (P < 0.05) in Charolais (24.5) and Limousin steaks (24.0) vs. Gelbvieh (22.2), Hereford (21.9), and Red Angus steaks (21.4). Thus, b* values changed less (P < 0.05) in Charolais and Limousin steaks (1.5 and 1.7, respectively) than in Angus, Gelbvieh, Hereford, and Red Angus steaks (4.3, 3.8, 4.4, and 5.1, respectively). After 6 d of display, Charolais and Limousin steaks had greater chroma (P < 0.05; 39.5 and 38.8, respectively) compared with Angus, Hereford, and Red Angus steaks (35.4, 35.3, and 33.9, respectively). Less (P < 0.05) change in chroma occurred for Charolais and Limousin (2.1 and 2.8, respectively) than in Angus, Gelbvieh, Hereford, and Red Angus steaks (7.1, 6.6, 7.4, and 9.0, respectively). Myoglobin concentration was less for Charolais and Limousin (P < 0.05; 2.77 and 2.72, respectively) compared with Gelbvieh, Red Angus, and Simmental steaks (3.62, 3.43, and 3.71, respectively). Breeds did not differ in pH (P > 0.05). These data suggest Charolais- and Limousin-carcasses produced steaks with greater lean color stability than Angus, Hereford, and Red Angus carcasses. Furthermore, these findings suggest that genetics contribute substantially to animal-to-animal variation in lean color, particularly in maintaining color.
来自具有 0%至 50% Angus、夏洛莱、Gelbvieh、海福特、利木赞、红安格斯和西门塔尔牛遗传背景的牛胸脊长条牛排(n = 464)在展示的 6 天期间进行了评估,以评估遗传因素对颜色稳定性的贡献。在展示的第 0 天和第 6 天测定了 CIE L*(亮度)、a*(红色度)、b*(黄色度)值、彩度、颜色变化(ΔE)和表面肌红蛋白(K/S 572/525)。肌红蛋白浓度具有高度遗传性(0.85),但最终 pH 值具有弱遗传性(0.06)。第 0 天的 L值具有中度遗传性(0.24)。第 6 天肌红蛋白、L和ΔE 的变化在很大程度上可以用遗传因素来解释(分别为 41%、40%和 29%)。在展示过程中的变化,a*(0.31)、b*(0.23)、彩度(0.35)和表面肌红蛋白(0.29)具有中度遗传性。在展示开始时,安格斯牛排的 L值比除夏洛莱牛以外的所有品种的 L值都高。第 6 天,安格斯牛排的 L值(50.0)大于 Gelbvieh、海福特和西门塔尔牛排(分别为 46.1、44.0 和 44.5)。第 0 天的 a、b*、彩度和ΔE 值不受品种影响(P > 0.05)。第 6 天,夏洛莱牛和利木赞牛的 a值(31.1 和 30.5)高于安格斯、海福特和红安格斯牛的 a值(27.4、27.7 和 26.3)。因此,安格斯、海福特和红安格斯牛的 a变化较小(P < 0.05;分别为 26.3、27.7 和 27.4)。第 6 天的 b值夏洛莱牛(24.5)和利木赞牛(24.0)高于 Gelbvieh(22.2)、海福特(21.9)和红安格斯牛(21.4)。因此,夏洛莱牛和利木赞牛的 b值变化较小(P < 0.05;分别为 1.5 和 1.7),而安格斯、海福特和红安格斯牛的 b值变化较大(分别为 4.3、3.8、4.4 和 5.1)。经过 6 天的展示,夏洛莱牛和利木赞牛的彩度较高(P < 0.05;分别为 39.5 和 38.8),而安格斯、海福特和红安格斯牛的彩度较低(分别为 35.4、35.3 和 33.9)。夏洛莱牛和利木赞牛的彩度变化较小(P < 0.05;分别为 2.1 和 2.8),而安格斯、海福特和红安格斯牛的彩度变化较大(分别为 7.1、6.6、7.4 和 9.0)。夏洛莱牛和利木赞牛的肌红蛋白浓度较低(P < 0.05;分别为 2.77 和 2.72),而 Gelbvieh、红安格斯和西门塔尔牛的肌红蛋白浓度较高(分别为 3.62、3.43 和 3.71)。品种间的 pH 值没有差异(P > 0.05)。这些数据表明,夏洛莱牛和利木赞牛的胴体产生的牛排比安格斯、海福特和红安格斯的牛排具有更好的瘦肉颜色稳定性。此外,这些发现表明,遗传因素对瘦肉颜色的动物间变化有很大贡献,特别是在保持颜色方面。