Suppr超能文献

达比加群酯与华法林治疗急性静脉血栓栓塞症的比较。

Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Henderson Research Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 10;361(24):2342-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906598.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients who have acute venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were initially given parenteral anticoagulation therapy for a median of 9 days (interquartile range, 8 to 11), we compared oral dabigatran, administered at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin that was dose-adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and related deaths. Safety end points included bleeding events, acute coronary syndromes, other adverse events, and results of liver-function tests.

RESULTS

A total of 30 of the 1274 patients randomly assigned to receive dabigatran (2.4%), as compared with 27 of the 1265 patients randomly assigned to warfarin (2.1%), had recurrent venous thromboembolism; the difference in risk was 0.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 1.5; P<0.001 for the prespecified noninferiority margin). The hazard ratio with dabigatran was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.84). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 20 patients assigned to dabigatran (1.6%) and in 24 patients assigned to warfarin (1.9%) (hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.48), and episodes of any bleeding were observed in 205 patients assigned to dabigatran (16.1%) and 277 patients assigned to warfarin (21.9%; hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85). The numbers of deaths, acute coronary syndromes, and abnormal liver-function tests were similar in the two groups. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 9.0% of patients assigned to dabigatran and in 6.8% of patients assigned to warfarin (P=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, a fixed dose of dabigatran is as effective as warfarin, has a safety profile that is similar to that of warfarin, and does not require laboratory monitoring. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00291330.)

摘要

背景

直接口服凝血酶抑制剂达比加群酯具有可预测的抗凝作用,对于初始接受静脉给予抗凝治疗中位数为 9 天(四分位间距,8 至 11)的急性静脉血栓栓塞症患者,它可能是华法林的替代疗法。

方法

在一项纳入了初始接受静脉给予抗凝治疗中位数为 9 天(四分位间距,8 至 11)的急性静脉血栓栓塞症患者的随机、双盲、非劣效性试验中,我们比较了口服达比加群酯,每日 2 次、每次 150mg 与华法林(调整剂量使国际标准化比值达到 2.0 至 3.0)。主要终点为 6 个月时复发的有症状的、经客观证实的静脉血栓栓塞症和相关死亡。安全性终点包括出血事件、急性冠状动脉综合征、其他不良事件和肝功能检查结果。

结果

在随机分配至接受达比加群酯的 1274 例患者中,有 30 例(2.4%)发生了复发的静脉血栓栓塞症,而随机分配至华法林的 1265 例患者中有 27 例(2.1%)发生了这种情况;风险差异为 0.4 个百分点(95%置信区间[CI],-0.8 至 1.5;达比加群酯的非劣效性边界预设值为<0.001)。达比加群酯的风险比为 1.10(95%CI,0.65 至 1.84)。接受达比加群酯治疗的 20 例患者(1.6%)和接受华法林治疗的 24 例患者(1.9%)发生了主要出血事件(达比加群酯的风险比,0.82;95%CI,0.45 至 1.48),接受达比加群酯治疗的 205 例患者(16.1%)和接受华法林治疗的 277 例患者(21.9%)发生了任何出血事件(达比加群酯的风险比,0.71;95%CI,0.59 至 0.85)。两组的死亡、急性冠状动脉综合征和肝功能检查异常的例数相似。接受达比加群酯治疗的 9.0%的患者和接受华法林治疗的 6.8%的患者发生了导致停止研究药物治疗的不良事件(P=0.05)。

结论

对于急性静脉血栓栓塞症的治疗,固定剂量的达比加群酯与华法林同样有效,安全性与华法林相似,且不需要实验室监测。(临床试验注册编号,NCT00291330。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验