Dr. Schulman, Thrombosis Service, HHS-General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada, Tel.: +1 905 5270271, ext 44479, Fax: +1 905 52115511, E-mail:
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jul;114(1):150-7. doi: 10.1160/TH14-11-0977. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
The efficacy and safety of dabigatran for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) were demonstrated in two trials. It is unclear if the results pertain to patients with cancer and VTE. Data from two randomised trials comparing dabigatran and warfarin for acute VTE were pooled. Primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent VTE and related death from randomisation to the end of the treatment period. Safety outcomes were major, major and clinically relevant non-major, and any bleeding during the oral-only treatment period. Patients with active cancer (=within 5 years) at baseline or diagnosed during the study were analysed. Compared with 4,772 patients without cancer, recurrent VTE occurred more frequently in 335 patients with cancer at any time (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.1-5.3) and more often in 114 with cancer diagnosed during the study compared to 221 with cancer at baseline (HR 2.6; 95 % CI, 1.1-6.2). There was no significant difference in efficacy between dabigatran and warfarin for cancer at baseline (HR 0.75; 95 % CI, 0.20-2.8) or diagnosed during the study (HR 0.63; 95 % CI, 0.20-2.0). Major bleeding (HR 4.1; 95 % CI, 2.2-7.5) and any bleeding (HR 1.5; 95 % CI, 1.2-2.0) were more frequent in patients with cancer than without, but with similar incidence in cancer with dabigatran or warfarin. In conclusion, in cancer patients, dabigatran provided similar clinical benefit as warfarin. VTE recurrence or bleeding were similar in patients on dabigatran or warfarin. The efficacy of dabigatran has not been assessed in comparison with low-molecular-weight heparin.
达比加群酯治疗静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的疗效和安全性已在两项试验中得到证实。目前尚不清楚这些结果是否适用于患有癌症和 VTE 的患者。对两项比较达比加群酯和华法林治疗急性 VTE 的随机试验数据进行了汇总。主要疗效终点为随机分组至治疗期末的症状性复发性 VTE 及相关死亡。安全性结局为大出血、重大非大出血和任何出血。对基线时患有活动性癌症(=5 年内)或研究期间诊断出癌症的患者进行了分析。与 4772 例无癌症患者相比,任何时间点有 335 例癌症患者发生复发性 VTE 的频率更高(风险比[HR]3.3;95%置信区间[CI],2.1-5.3),且在研究期间诊断出癌症的 114 例患者与基线时有癌症的 221 例患者相比,复发性 VTE 的发生率更高(HR 2.6;95%CI,1.1-6.2)。基线时有癌症(HR 0.75;95%CI,0.20-2.8)或研究期间诊断出癌症(HR 0.63;95%CI,0.20-2.0)的患者,达比加群酯和华法林的疗效无显著差异。大出血(HR 4.1;95%CI,2.2-7.5)和任何出血(HR 1.5;95%CI,1.2-2.0)在癌症患者中更为常见,但达比加群酯或华法林治疗的癌症患者出血发生率相似。总之,在癌症患者中,达比加群酯与华法林具有相似的临床获益。达比加群酯或华法林治疗的患者复发性 VTE 或出血情况相似。达比加群酯的疗效尚未与低分子肝素进行比较评估。