Liu Yiming, Li Jihua, Hu Jing, Zhu Songsong, Luo En, Hsu Yuchun
The State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Faculty, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb;109(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of autogenous coronoid process pedicled on temporal muscle grafts (ACPTMG) for reconstruction of the mandible condyle, and to compare the differences in clinical effects with autogenous free coronoid process grafts (AFCPG) in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis.
From 2003 to 2005, 48 patients who were diagnosed with uni- or bilateral TMJ ankylosis were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A(24 cases, 28 joints) and group B(24 cases, 30 joints). All patients underwent operations for resection of condyle and surrounding bony masses and simultaneous recreation of the glenoid fossa, which was followed with, for group A, condylar reconstruction using ACPTMG and, for group B, AFCPG, as well as interposition of temporal muscle myofascial flaps or native articular disc. The pre- and postoperative interinsicial opening values and mouth-opening deviation were measured, and decrease in height of mandible ramus was analyzed by panoramic radiographs.
All patients showed apparent improved joint function except 1 patient of group B, who showed signs of reankylosis of the joint (<20 mm mouth opening). Radiographic examination and 3-dimensional computerized tomography both showed the grafts to be well attached to the ramus in their original positions and adaptive remodeling in both groups, but relatively more evident bony resorption was noted in group B. The mean measurement of mouth-opening deviation and postoperative decrease in height of mandible ramus in group B were significantly higher than in group A.
Satisfactory clinical outcomes show that both ACPTMG and AFCPG seem to be alternative and promising methods in the treatment of TMJ bony ankylosis. Compared with AFCPG, the advantages of ACPTMG include less bony resorption and better long-term clinical outcomes.
本研究旨在探讨颞肌蒂自体喙突移植(ACPTMG)重建下颌骨髁突的可行性,并比较其与自体游离喙突移植(AFCPG)治疗颞下颌关节(TMJ)强直患者的临床效果差异。
2003年至2005年,48例诊断为单侧或双侧TMJ强直的患者被随机分为2组:A组(24例,28个关节)和B组(24例,30个关节)。所有患者均接受髁突及周围骨块切除并同期重建关节窝手术,随后,A组采用ACPTMG进行髁突重建,B组采用AFCPG进行髁突重建,并植入颞肌肌筋膜瓣或天然关节盘进行关节盘置换术。测量术前和术后关节间开口值及开口偏斜度,并通过全景X线片分析下颌支高度降低情况。
除B组1例患者出现关节重新强直迹象(开口<20 mm)外所有患者关节功能均有明显改善)。影像学检查和三维计算机断层扫描均显示两组移植骨均在原位置与下颌支附着良好并适应性重塑,但B组骨吸收相对更明显。B组开口偏斜度的平均测量值及术后下颌支高度降低值均显著高于A组均显著高于A组。
满意临床结果表明,ACPTMG和AFCPG似乎都是治疗TMJ骨性强直的可供选择且有前景的方法。与AFCPG相比,ACPTMG的优点包括骨吸收较少和长期临床效果更好。