Suppr超能文献

局部麻醉与全身麻醉下腹股沟疝修补术后伤口并发症的比较。

A comparison of wound complications after inguinal hernia repair under local and general anaesthesia.

作者信息

Ofili O P

机构信息

University Department of Surgery, Murtala Muhammed Specialist Hospital, Bayero University, Knao, Nigeria.

出版信息

Trop Doct. 1991 Jan;21(1):40-1. doi: 10.1177/004947559102100118.

Abstract

Ninety-one male patients with unilateral reducible inguinal hernia were randomly allocated to receive either general or local anaesthesia in order to compare the incidence of postoperative wound complications following both methods of anaesthesia. Forty-seven patients received local anaesthesia while 44 received general anaesthesia. Two patients (4.3%) who received local anaesthesia and three patients (6.8%) who received general anaesthesia developed various types of postoperative wound complications. Chi-squared test however showed no significant difference in the incidence of wound complications between the two groups of patients.

摘要

91例单侧可复性腹股沟疝男性患者被随机分配接受全身麻醉或局部麻醉,以比较两种麻醉方法术后伤口并发症的发生率。47例患者接受局部麻醉,44例接受全身麻醉。接受局部麻醉的2例患者(4.3%)和接受全身麻醉的3例患者(6.8%)出现了各种类型的术后伤口并发症。然而,卡方检验显示两组患者伤口并发症的发生率没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验