Frühauf S, Zeller W J
Institute of Toxicology and Chemotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1991;27(4):301-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00685116.
The antitumor activity of eight new metal complexes (three platinum, one titanium, four ruthenium derivatives) was investigated in a cisplatin (DDP)--sensitive (O-342) and a DDP-resistant (O-342/DDP) ovarian tumor line using the bilayer soft-agar assay. A continuous exposure set up at logarithmically spaced concentrations was used to test the drugs; to uncover possible pharmacokinetic features, a short-term exposure was additionally included for selected compounds. DDP served as the reference drug. The following compounds were investigated: 18-crown-6-tetracarboxybis-diammineplatinum(II) (CTDP), cis-aminotrismethylenephosphonato-diammine-platinum(II) (ADP), cis-diamminecyclohexano-aminotrismethylenephosphonato-platin um(II) (DAP), diethoxybis(1-phenylbutane-1,3-dionato)titanium(IV) (DBT, budotitane), trans-imidazolium-bisimidazoletetrachlororuthenate(III) (ICR), trans-indazolium-tetrachlorobisindazoleruthenate(III) (IndCR), cis-triazolium-tetrachlorobis-triazoleruthenate(III) (TCR) and trans-pyrazolium-tetrachlorobispyrazoleruthenate(III) (PCR). Of the new metal complexes, CTDP was the most active compound in O-342, resulting in a percentage of control plating efficiency (+/- SE) of 1 +/- 1, 12 +/- 8 and 40 +/- 21 following continuous exposure to 10, 1 and 0.1 microM, respectively, and was thus comparable to DDP at equimolar concentrations. In the resistant line, 10 microM CTDP reduced colony growth to 18% +/- 8%, whereas an equimolar concentration of DDP effected a reduction to 26% +/- 9%. During short-term exposure. CTDP was inferior to DDP, which may be ascribed to the stability of the bis-dicarboxylate platinum ring system. The titanium compound DBT, in contrast, showed promising effects at its highest concentration (100 microM) during short-term exposure in both lines; at this concentration the activity in O-342/DDP was higher than that in O-342 (7% +/- 7% vs 34% +/- 17% of control plating efficiency at 100 microM). All ruthenium complexes showed higher activity in the resistant line O-342/DDP than in the sensitive counterpart. ICR was the most active compound. Following continuous exposure of O-342/DDP cells to 10 microM ICR, colony growth was reduced to 18% +/- 4% that of controls. Further studies should concentrate on CTDP and ICR for the following reasons; the activity of CTDP was equal to that of DDP at equimolar concentrations during continuous exposure; considering that the in vivo toxicity of DDP was 3-fold that of CTDP, an increase in the therapeutic index of CTDP would be expected. ICR showed the best effect of all ruthenium complexes; it was superior to DDP in the resistant line.
使用双层软琼脂试验,在顺铂(DDP)敏感的(O - 342)和DDP耐药的(O - 342/DDP)卵巢肿瘤细胞系中研究了8种新型金属配合物(3种铂、1种钛、4种钌衍生物)的抗肿瘤活性。采用对数间隔浓度的连续暴露设置来测试药物;为了揭示可能的药代动力学特征,还对选定的化合物进行了短期暴露试验。DDP作为参比药物。研究的化合物如下:18 - 冠 - 6 - 四羧基双二胺铂(II)(CTDP)、顺 - 氨基三亚甲基膦酸二胺铂(II)(ADP)、顺 - 二胺环己烷氨基三亚甲基膦酸铂(II)(DAP)、二乙氧基双(1 - 苯基丁烷 - 1,3 - 二酮)钛(IV)(DBT,布多替钛)、反式咪唑鎓 - 双咪唑四氯钌(III)(ICR)、反式吲唑鎓 - 四氯双吲唑钌(III)(IndCR)顺式三唑鎓 - 四氯双三唑钌(III)(TCR)和反式吡唑鎓 - 四氯双吡唑钌(III)(PCR)。在新型金属配合物中,CTDP是O - 342中活性最高的化合物,在分别连续暴露于10、1和0.1μM后,对照平板效率百分比(±SE)分别为1±1、12±8和40±21,因此在等摩尔浓度下与DDP相当。在耐药细胞系中,10μM CTDP将集落生长降低至18%±8%,而等摩尔浓度的DDP则将其降低至26%±9%。在短期暴露期间,CTDP不如DDP,这可能归因于双二羧酸铂环系统的稳定性。相比之下,钛化合物DBT在两条细胞系短期暴露于其最高浓度(100μM)时均显示出有前景的效果;在此浓度下,O - 342/DDP中的活性高于O - 342(100μM时对照平板效率分别为7%±7%和34%±17%)。所有钌配合物在耐药细胞系O - 342/DDP中均比在敏感细胞系中表现出更高的活性。ICR是活性最高的化合物。将O - 342/DDP细胞连续暴露于10μM ICR后,集落生长降低至对照的18%±4%。基于以下原因,进一步的研究应集中在CTDP和ICR上;在连续暴露期间,CTDP在等摩尔浓度下的活性与DDP相当;考虑到DDP的体内毒性是CTDP的3倍,预计CTDP的治疗指数会增加。ICR在所有钌配合物中表现出最佳效果;在耐药细胞系中它优于DDP。