Keele University, Keele, UK
Med Teach. 2009 Dec;31(12):1081-5. doi: 10.3109/01421590903199692.
This article describes a study in two acute NHS Trusts of the availability and curriculum relevance of inpatients for undergraduate medical student learning. The study was conducted to assist a new medical school plan on how best to utilise the clinical learning resources of adjacent hospitals, at a time when basic medical education is expanding, large academic hospitals are becoming more specialised and medical care provision is shifting to smaller hospital and ambulatory settings. We found that all three hospitals showed similar proportions, mean ages and gender ratios of available patients, and provided a wide range of clinical learning opportunities. The larger academic hospital appeared to offer a narrower, more specialised, range of patient problems that were necessary to meet curriculum objectives, while the smaller hospitals provided a broader range of common problems. Opportunities to participate in clinical skills were limited in all three hospitals. None of the hospitals appeared to provide sufficient clinical material to meet all curriculum learning objectives. As acute health care delivery models change, medical schools may have to be quite deliberate in their utilisation of academic hospitals, community hospitals and primary care, matching student allocations carefully to sources of relevant learning opportunities.
本文描述了在两家急性国民保健服务信托基金中,住院患者对本科医学生学习的可用性和课程相关性的研究。这项研究旨在协助一所新医学院制定最佳计划,以利用毗邻医院的临床学习资源,当时基础医学教育正在扩大,大型学术医院变得更加专业化,医疗服务提供正在转向规模较小的医院和门诊环境。我们发现,所有三家医院的可用患者比例、平均年龄和性别比例都相似,并提供了广泛的临床学习机会。较大的学术医院似乎提供了更窄、更专业的一系列患者问题,这些问题是满足课程目标所必需的,而较小的医院则提供了更广泛的常见问题。在所有三家医院,参与临床技能的机会都受到限制。没有一家医院似乎提供了足够的临床材料来满足所有课程学习目标。随着急性医疗服务提供模式的改变,医学院可能不得不非常慎重地利用学术医院、社区医院和初级保健,仔细匹配学生的分配,以满足相关学习机会的来源。