Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Chronic Disease Epidemiology, University of Zürich, Sumatrastr. 30, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Thorax. 2010 Feb;65(2):150-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.115063. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
Understanding the prognostic meaning of early stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the general population is relevant for discussions about underdiagnosis. To date, COPD prevalence and incidence have often been estimated using prebrochodilation spirometry instead of postbronchodilation spirometry. In the SAPALDIA (Swiss Study on Air Pollution and Lung Disease in Adults) cohort, time course, clinical relevance and determinants of severity stages of obstruction were investigated using prebronchodilator spirometry.
Incident obstruction was defined as an FEV(1)/FVC (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity) ratio >or=0.70 at baseline and <0.70 at follow-up, and non-persistence was defined inversely. Determinants were assessed in 5490 adults with spirometry and respiratory symptom data in 1991 and 2002 using Poisson regression controlling for self-declared asthma and wheezing. Change in obstruction severity (defined analogously to the GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) classification) over 11 years was related to shortness of breath and health service utilisation for respiratory problems by logistic models.
The incidence rate of obstruction was 14.2 cases/1000 person years. 20.9% of obstructive cases (n = 113/540) were non-persistent. Age, smoking, chronic bronchitis and non-current asthma were determinants of incidence. After adjustment for asthma, only progressive stage I or persistent stage II obstruction was associated with shortness of breath (OR 1.71, 95% CI 0.83 to 3.54; OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.50 to 6.42, respectively) and health service utilisation for respiratory problems (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.02 to 6.10; OR 4.17 95% CI 1.91 to 9.13, respectively) at follow-up.
The observed non-persistence of obstruction suggests that prebronchodilation spirometry, as used in epidemiological studies, might misclassify COPD. Future epidemiological studies should consider both prebronchodilation and postbronchodilation measurements and take specific clinical factors related to asthma and COPD into consideration for estimation of disease burden and prediction of health outcomes.
了解普通人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)早期阶段的预后意义与讨论漏诊有关。迄今为止,COPD 的患病率和发病率通常是使用预支气管扩张肺活量测定法而不是支气管扩张后肺活量测定法来估计的。在 SAPALDIA(瑞士成人空气污染与肺部疾病研究)队列中,使用预支气管扩张肺活量测定法研究了阻塞严重程度阶段的时间进程、临床相关性和决定因素。
以基线时 FEV1/FVC(1 秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量)比值≥0.70 且随访时<0.70 定义为新发阻塞,反之则定义为持续存在。使用泊松回归,控制自报哮喘和喘息,在 1991 年和 2002 年进行肺活量测定和呼吸症状数据的 5490 名成年人中评估了这些决定因素。通过逻辑模型将 11 年内阻塞严重程度的变化(与 GOLD(全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议)分类类似地定义)与呼吸困难和呼吸问题的卫生服务利用相关联。
阻塞的发病率为 14.2 例/1000 人年。540 例阻塞病例中有 20.9%(n=113)为非持续存在。年龄、吸烟、慢性支气管炎和非当前哮喘是发病的决定因素。调整哮喘后,仅进展性 I 期或持续性 II 期阻塞与呼吸困难(比值比 1.71,95%置信区间 0.83 至 3.54;比值比 3.11,95%置信区间 1.50 至 6.42)和呼吸问题的卫生服务利用(比值比 2.49,95%置信区间 1.02 至 6.10;比值比 4.17,95%置信区间 1.91 至 9.13)相关。
观察到的阻塞非持续存在表明,在流行病学研究中使用的预支气管扩张肺活量测定法可能会错误分类 COPD。未来的流行病学研究应同时考虑预支气管扩张和支气管扩张后测量,并考虑与哮喘和 COPD 相关的特定临床因素,以估计疾病负担和预测健康结果。