Leth Peter Mygind, Ibsen Marlene
Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1413-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b251b8.
The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the value of postmortem computerized tomography (CT) for Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scoring and Injury Severity Scoring (ISS) of traffic fatalities.
This is a prospective investigation of a consecutive series of 52 traffic fatalities from Southern Denmark that were CT scanned and autopsied. The AIS and ISS scores based on CT and autopsy (AU) were registered in a computer database and compared. Kappa values for reproducibility of AIS-severity scores and ISS scores were calculated.
On an average, there was a 94% agreement between AU and CT in detecting the presence or absence of lesions in the various anatomic regions, and the severity scores were the same in 90% of all cases (range, 75-100%). When different severity scoring was obtained, CT detected more lesions with a high severity score in the facial skeleton, pelvis, and extremities, whereas AU detected more lesions with high scores in the soft tissues (especially in the aorta), cranium, and ribs. The kappa value for reproducibility of AIS scores confirmed that the agreement between the two methods was good. The lowest kappa values (>0.6) were found for the facial skeleton, cerebellum, meninges, neck organs, lungs, kidneys, and gastrointestinal tract. In these areas, the kappa value provided moderate agreement between CT and AU. For all other areas, there was a substantial agreement between the two methods. The ISS scores obtained by CT and by AU were calculated and were found to be with no or moderate variation in 85%. Rupture of the aorta was often overlooked by CT, resulting in too low ISS scoring.
The most precise postmortem AIS and ISS scorings of traffic fatalities was obtained by a combination of AU and CT. If it is not possible to perform an AU, then CT may be used as an acceptable alternative for AIS scoring. We have identified one important obstacle for postmortem ISS scoring, namely that aorta ruptures are not easily detected by post mortem CT.
本研究旨在评估尸体计算机断层扫描(CT)在交通死亡事故简略损伤量表(AIS)评分和损伤严重程度评分(ISS)中的价值。
这是一项对丹麦南部连续52例交通死亡事故进行的前瞻性研究,这些病例均接受了CT扫描和尸检。基于CT和尸检(AU)得出的AIS和ISS评分被记录在计算机数据库中并进行比较。计算AIS严重程度评分和ISS评分的再现性kappa值。
平均而言,在检测各个解剖区域是否存在病变方面,AU和CT之间的一致性为94%,并且在所有病例的90%中(范围为75 - 100%)严重程度评分相同。当获得不同的严重程度评分时,CT在面部骨骼、骨盆和四肢中检测到更多具有高严重程度评分的病变,而AU在软组织(尤其是主动脉)、颅骨和肋骨中检测到更多具有高评分的病变。AIS评分再现性的kappa值证实两种方法之间的一致性良好。在面部骨骼、小脑、脑膜、颈部器官、肺、肾和胃肠道中发现最低的kappa值(>0.6)。在这些区域,kappa值表明CT和AU之间具有中等一致性。对于所有其他区域,两种方法之间具有高度一致性。计算了通过CT和AU获得的ISS评分,发现85%的评分无差异或差异中等。主动脉破裂经常被CT漏诊,导致ISS评分过低。
通过AU和CT相结合可获得交通死亡事故最精确的死后AIS和ISS评分。如果无法进行AU,那么CT可作为AIS评分的可接受替代方法。我们已经确定了死后ISS评分的一个重要障碍,即死后CT不容易检测到主动脉破裂。