Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 15;44(2):749-54. doi: 10.1021/es902318g.
There is a need for simple air sampling techniques to enable routine monitoring of the occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in compliance with occupational exposure limits. Other gas-phase contaminants can be monitored in workplaces using passive samplers but this is currently not the case for PAHs. Here, polyurethane foam (PUF) disk passive air samplers (PAS), routinely used for outdoor air monitoring of PAHs and POPs, were assessed for their suitability in an indoor occupational environment against: ability to accumulate detectable levels within 1-2 weeks; quantitative sampling of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), precision, uptake kinetics, influence of shelter design, and performance of 16 deuterated PAHs as depuration compounds (DCs). Sampling rates (R-values) for PAHs in PUF-PAS, estimated by comparison to low-volume active samplers, and the loss of DCs, varied for individual PAHs (1-10 m(3) day(-1)) but were found to be in the same order of magnitude for both gas-phase and particle-associated PAHs including BaP. Only one PAH (Acy) fulfilled the DC criteria of >40% loss during the 2 week exposure. These results suggest that PUF-PAS are potentially useful tools for PAHs in occupational environments in screening workplaces and identifying sources/hotspots - although unlikely to replace active sampling.
需要简单的空气采样技术,以便根据职业接触限值,对多环芳烃(PAHs)的职业接触进行常规监测。其他气相污染物可以使用被动采样器在工作场所进行监测,但目前 PAHs 还无法做到这一点。在此,评估了聚氨酯泡沫(PUF)圆盘被动空气采样器(PAS)在室内职业环境中的适用性,以评估其在 1-2 周内积累可检测水平的能力、定量采集苯并[a]芘(BaP)的能力、精密度、吸收动力学、遮蔽设计的影响以及 16 种氘代 PAHs 作为净化化合物(DCs)的性能。通过与低容量主动采样器进行比较,估算出 PUF-PAS 中 PAHs 的采样速率(R 值),以及 DCs 的损失,对于个别 PAHs(1-10 m3/天)变化较大,但发现对于气相和颗粒相 PAHs (包括 BaP),其损失均处于同一数量级。只有一种 PAH(Acy)在 2 周暴露期间满足 >40%损失的 DC 标准。这些结果表明,PUF-PAS 可能是职业环境中 PAHs 的有用工具,可用于筛选工作场所并识别源/热点-尽管不太可能替代主动采样。