Suppr超能文献

评估聚氨酯泡沫被动空气采样器(PUF)作为职业性多环芳烃测量工具的性能。

Evaluation of polyurethane foam passive air sampler (PUF) as a tool for occupational PAH measurements.

作者信息

Strandberg Bo, Julander Anneli, Sjöström Mattias, Lewné Marie, Koca Akdeva Hatice, Bigert Carolina

机构信息

Section of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Unit of Work Environment Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2018 Jan;190:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.106. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

Abstract

Routine monitoring of workplace exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is performed mainly via active sampling. However, active samplers have several drawbacks and, in some cases, may even be unusable. Polyurethane foam (PUF) as personal passive air samplers constitute good alternatives for PAH monitoring in occupational air (8 h). However, PUFs must be further tested to reliably yield detectable levels of PAHs in short exposure times (1-3 h) and under extreme occupational conditions. Therefore, we compared the personal exposure monitoring performance of a passive PUF sampler with that of an active air sampler and determined the corresponding uptake rates (Rs). These rates were then used to estimate the occupational exposure of firefighters and police forensic specialists to 32 PAHs. The work environments studied were heavily contaminated by PAHs with (for example) benzo(a)pyrene ranging from 0.2 to 56 ng m, as measured via active sampling. We show that, even after short exposure times, PUF can reliably accumulate both gaseous and particle-bound PAHs. The Rs-values are almost independent of variables such as the concentration and the wind speed. Therefore, by using the Rs-values (2.0-20 m day), the air concentrations can be estimated within a factor of two for gaseous PAHs and a factor of 10 for particulate PAHs. With very short sampling times (1 h), our method can serve as a (i) simple and user-friendly semi-quantitative screening tool for estimating and tracking point sources of PAH in micro-environments and (ii) complement to the traditional active pumping methods.

摘要

工作场所多环芳烃(PAHs)暴露的常规监测主要通过主动采样进行。然而,主动采样器存在几个缺点,在某些情况下甚至可能无法使用。聚氨酯泡沫(PUF)作为个人被动空气采样器,是职业空气中PAH监测的良好替代方法(8小时)。然而,PUF必须进一步测试,以便在短暴露时间(1 - 3小时)和极端职业条件下可靠地产生可检测水平的PAHs。因此,我们比较了被动PUF采样器与主动空气采样器的个人暴露监测性能,并确定了相应的摄取率(Rs)。然后使用这些比率来估计消防员和警察法医专家对32种PAHs的职业暴露。通过主动采样测量,所研究的工作环境受到PAHs的严重污染,例如苯并[a]芘的含量范围为0.2至56 ng/m³。我们表明,即使在短暴露时间后,PUF也能可靠地积累气态和颗粒结合态的PAHs。Rs值几乎与浓度和风速等变量无关。因此,通过使用Rs值(2.0 - 20 m³/天),气态PAHs的空气浓度可以在两倍的误差范围内估计,颗粒态PAHs的误差范围为10倍。在非常短的采样时间(1小时)内,我们的方法可以作为(i)一种简单且用户友好的半定量筛选工具,用于估计和跟踪微环境中PAH的点源,以及(ii)传统主动抽吸方法的补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验