Suppr超能文献

超声检查对于无定位症状的胃肠道肿瘤患者的诊断是一种准确的技术。

Ultrasonography is an accurate technique for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors in patients without localizing symptoms.

机构信息

Service of Digestive Disease, Complejo Hospitalario Xeral-Cíes, Complejo Hospitarlario Universitario de Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009 Nov;101(11):773-86. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082009001100005.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

This study compared the accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors in patients with several degrees of clinical suspicion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We recruited patients that were suspect for gastrointestinal neoplasia but with no evidence of localizing symptoms (group A), and patients that were suspect for colon cancer (group B) or for gastric cancer (group C). Accuracy in the diagnosis was compared for: gastric cancer in groups A and C, and for colon cancer in groups A and B. The comparison was made by using the contingency coefficient, which quantifies coincidence of endoscopic and ultrasonographic diagnoses.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included in group A (48 males), wherein 12 colon and 5 gastric neoplasms were detected. Group B was comprised of 153 patients (78 males) and included 66 patients with colorectal cancer (CCR). Group C contained 58 patients (35 males), 31 of whom were diagnosed with gastric cancer. The accuracy of sonography for diagnosing colon cancer was 95.5% for group A and 87.5% for group B. The contingency coefficient for endoscopy vs. ultrasonography was greater for group A: 0.658 than for group B: 0.549. The diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer was 97.4% for group A and 86.2% for group C. The contingency coefficient between endoscopic and ultrasonographic diagnoses was also greater in group A (0.618) than in group C (0.588).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosing colon and gastric cancer is not lower in patients without localizing symptoms.

摘要

简介和目的

本研究比较了超声诊断不同程度临床怀疑胃肠道肿瘤的准确性。

材料和方法

我们招募了怀疑患有胃肠道肿瘤但无局部症状证据的患者(A 组),以及怀疑结肠癌(B 组)或胃癌(C 组)的患者。比较了 A 组和 C 组胃癌、A 组和 B 组结肠癌的诊断准确性。采用列联系数比较内镜和超声诊断的一致性,列联系数定量评估内镜和超声诊断的一致性。

结果

A 组共纳入 79 例患者(男 48 例),其中发现 12 例结肠和 5 例胃肿瘤。B 组共纳入 153 例患者(男 78 例),其中 66 例为结直肠癌(CRC)。C 组包含 58 例患者(男 35 例),其中 31 例诊断为胃癌。超声诊断结肠癌的准确性在 A 组为 95.5%,在 B 组为 87.5%。A 组内镜与超声诊断的列联系数为 0.658,B 组为 0.549,A 组大于 B 组。A 组诊断胃癌的准确性为 97.4%,C 组为 86.2%。A 组内镜与超声诊断的列联系数(0.618)也大于 C 组(0.588)。

结论

在无局部症状的患者中,超声诊断结肠癌和胃癌的准确性并不低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验