Waugaman Richard M
Folger Shakespeare Library, USA.
J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2009 Winter;37(4):627-43. doi: 10.1521/jaap.2009.37.4.627.
There is now abundant evidence that Freud was correct in believing Edward de Vere (1550-1604) wrote under the pseudonym "William Shakespeare." One common reaction is "What difference does it make?" I address that question by examining many significant connections between de Vere's life and The Tempest. Such studies promise to bring our understanding of Shakespeare's works back into line with our usual psychoanalytic approach to literature, which examines how a great writer's imagination weaves a new creation out of the threads of his or her life experiences. One source of the intense controversy about de Vere's authorship is our idealization of the traditional author, about whom we know so little that, as Freud noted, we can imagine his personality was as fine as his works.
现在有大量证据表明,弗洛伊德认为爱德华·德·维尔(1550 - 1604)以“威廉·莎士比亚”为笔名写作是正确的。一种常见的反应是“这有什么区别呢?”我通过研究德·维尔的生活与《暴风雨》之间的许多重要联系来回答这个问题。这样的研究有望使我们对莎士比亚作品的理解回归到我们通常对文学的精神分析方法,即研究伟大作家的想象力如何从他或她的生活经历中编织出新的作品。关于德·维尔作者身份的激烈争议的一个根源是我们对传统作者的理想化,我们对传统作者知之甚少,以至于正如弗洛伊德所指出的,我们可以想象他的人格与他的作品一样优秀。