Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Acta Oncol. 2010;49(2):230-6. doi: 10.3109/02841860903410372.
The use of Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and Helical tomotherapy (HT) is increasing in gynecological cancer patients. No published studies have performed a dosimetric evaluation of whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) using HT for postoperative endometrial cancer. The purpose of this study was to perform a direct dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), IMRT and HT plans for WPRT in postoperative endometrial cancer patients, and to evaluate the integral dose to organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissue.
We selected ten patients with endometrial cancer undergoing postoperative WPRT. Plans for 3D-CRT, IMRT and HT were developed for each patient. All plans were normalized to deliver 50 Gy to 95% of the PTV. The dosimetry and integral dose to OARs and normal tissue were compared. The significance of differences was tested using a paired two-tailed Student t-test.
IMRT were superior to 3D-CRT in dose conformity (conformity index: 0.87 vs. 0.61, p = 0.00) and integral dose to OARs and normal tissue, although a greater volume of normal tissue receiving dose below 10 Gy was observed. The results were similar in HT except that the integral dose to normal tissue increased slightly. Compared directly with IMRT, HT showed better dose homogeneity and lower integral dose to rectum and bladder, but the integral dose to pelvic bones and normal tissue slightly increased.
In postoperative WPRT of endometrial cancer, IMRT and HT result in better conformity and lower integral dose to OARs compared with 3D-CRT. The integral dose to normal tissue did not increase significantly in IMRT, although a greater volume of normal tissue is irradiated to the dose below 10 Gy. HT further improves the dose homogeneity and integral dose to rectum and bladder, at the expense of a slightly higher integral dose to pelvic bones and normal tissue.
在妇科癌症患者中,调强放疗(IMRT)和螺旋断层放疗(HT)的应用正在增加。目前尚无研究对术后子宫内膜癌患者使用 HT 行全盆腔放疗(WPRT)进行剂量学评估。本研究旨在对术后子宫内膜癌患者行 WPRT 的三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)、调强放疗和螺旋断层放疗计划进行直接剂量学比较,并评估危及器官(OARs)和正常组织的积分剂量。
我们选择了 10 例接受术后 WPRT 的子宫内膜癌患者。为每位患者制定了 3D-CRT、IMRT 和 HT 计划。所有计划均归一化为将 50Gy 递送至 95%的 PTV。比较了 OARs 和正常组织的剂量学和积分剂量。使用配对双侧学生 t 检验检验差异的显著性。
与 3D-CRT 相比,IMRT 在剂量适形性(适形指数:0.87 对 0.61,p = 0.00)和 OARs 及正常组织的积分剂量方面具有优势,尽管观察到接受低于 10Gy 剂量的正常组织体积增大。HT 的结果与之相似,只是正常组织的积分剂量略有增加。与 IMRT 直接比较,HT 显示出更好的剂量均匀性和较低的直肠和膀胱积分剂量,但骨盆骨和正常组织的积分剂量略有增加。
在子宫内膜癌术后 WPRT 中,与 3D-CRT 相比,IMRT 和 HT 可使 OARs 的适形性更好,积分剂量更低。IMRT 中正常组织的积分剂量没有显著增加,尽管接受低于 10Gy 剂量的正常组织体积增大。HT 进一步改善了直肠和膀胱的剂量均匀性和积分剂量,但代价是骨盆骨和正常组织的积分剂量略有增加。