Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009 Nov;21(9):706-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
To evaluate the integral dose to organs at risk (OARs), normal tissue and the whole body in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and helical tomotherapy for whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) in postoperative endometrial cancer patients.
We selected 10 patients with endometrial cancer undergoing postoperative WPRT. Plans of 6MV-3DCRT, 18MV-3DCRT, 6MV-IMRT, 18MV-IMRT and helical tomotherapy were developed for each patient. The integral doses to OARs, normal tissue and the whole body were compared.
Compared with 3DCRT, both IMRT and helical tomotherapy significantly improved dose conformity and the integral doses to OARs (8.8-29.9%, P<0.05). Compared with 6MV-3DCRT, IMRT resulted in 13.2 and 11.0% lower integral doses to normal tissue and the whole body, respectively (P=0.00), whereas no significant difference was found with helical tomotherapy. Compared directly with IMRT, helical tomotherapy reduced the integral doses to the rectum and bladder. However, the integral doses to normal tissue were 13.9 and 17.1% higher than 6MV-IMRT and 18MV-IMRT plans, respectively (P=0.00); the integral doses to pelvic bones also slightly increased with helical tomotherapy. The use of 18MV resulted in 5.8 and 2.7% lower integral doses to normal tissue and 4.8 and 2.1% lower integral doses to the whole body in the 3DCRT and IMRT plans, respectively (P=0.00).
Results show that IMRT and helical tomotherapy offer better conformity and lower integral doses to OARs for postoperative WPRT of endometrial cancers compared with 3DCRT. The integral doses to normal tissue and the whole body were significantly lower with IMRT, whereas no significant difference was found with helical tomotherapy compared with 6MV-3DCRT. Compared directly with IMRT, helical tomotherapy further reduced the integral doses to the rectum and bladder, at the expense of a slightly higher integral dose to pelvic bones and normal tissue. The use of 18MV improved the integral doses to normal tissue and the whole body in both 3DCRT and IMRT.
评估术后子宫内膜癌全盆腔放疗中,危及器官(OAR)、正常组织和全身的积分剂量,比较三维适形放疗(3DCRT)、调强放疗(IMRT)和螺旋断层放疗(HT)的剂量学差异。
选取 10 例术后行全盆腔放疗的子宫内膜癌患者,为每位患者设计 6MV-3DCRT、18MV-3DCRT、6MV-IMRT、18MV-IMRT 和螺旋断层放疗计划。比较 OAR、正常组织和全身的积分剂量。
与 3DCRT 相比,IMRT 和螺旋断层放疗均显著改善了 OAR 的剂量适形性和积分剂量(8.8%-29.9%,P<0.05)。与 6MV-3DCRT 相比,IMRT 使正常组织和全身的积分剂量分别降低了 13.2%和 11.0%(P=0.00),而螺旋断层放疗则无显著差异。与 IMRT 直接比较,螺旋断层放疗降低了直肠和膀胱的积分剂量。然而,螺旋断层放疗使直肠和膀胱的积分剂量分别比 6MV-IMRT 和 18MV-IMRT 计划高 13.9%和 17.1%(P=0.00);骨盆骨的积分剂量也略有增加。在 3DCRT 和 IMRT 计划中,18MV 使正常组织和全身的积分剂量分别降低了 5.8%和 2.7%,4.8%和 2.1%(P=0.00)。
结果表明,与 3DCRT 相比,IMRT 和螺旋断层放疗为术后子宫内膜癌全盆腔放疗提供了更好的适形性和更低的 OAR 积分剂量。与 6MV-3DCRT 相比,IMRT 使正常组织和全身的积分剂量显著降低,而与螺旋断层放疗相比则无显著差异。与 IMRT 直接比较,螺旋断层放疗进一步降低了直肠和膀胱的积分剂量,但骨盆骨和正常组织的积分剂量略有升高。18MV 的使用改善了 3DCRT 和 IMRT 中正常组织和全身的积分剂量。