Departamento de Anestesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Apr;54(4):447-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02183.x. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
The performance of propofol effect-site pharmacokinetic models during target-controlled infusion (TCI) might be affected by propofol administration rate. This study compares the predictive ability of three effect-site pharmacokinetic models during fast and slow infusion rates, utilizing the cerebral state index (CSI) as a monitor of consciousness.
Sixteen healthy volunteers, 21-45 years of age, were randomly assigned to receive either a bolus dose of propofol 1.8 mg/kg at a rate of 1200 ml/h or an infusion of 12 mg/kg/h until 3-5 min after loss of consciousness (LOC). After spontaneous recovery of the CSI, the bolus was administered to patients who had first received the infusion and vice versa. The study was completed after spontaneous recovery of CSI following the second dose scheme. LOC was assessed and recorded when it occurred. Adequacies of model predictions during both administration schemes were assessed by comparing the effect-site concentrations estimated at the time of LOC during the bolus dose and during the infusion scheme.
LOC occurred 0.97 +/- 0.29 min after the bolus dose and 6.77 +/- 3.82 min after beginning the infusion scheme (P<0.05). The Ce estimated with Schnider (ke0=0.45/min), Marsh (ke0=1.21/min) and Marsh (ke0=0.26/min) at LOC were 4.40 +/- 1.45, 3.55 +/- 0.64 and 1.28 +/- 0.44 microg/ml during the bolus dose and 2.81 +/- 0.61, 2.50 +/- 0.39 and 1.72 +/- 0.41 microg/ml, during the infusion scheme (P<0.05). The CSI values observed at LOC were 70 +/- 4 during the bolus dose and 71 +/- 2 during the infusion scheme (NS).
Speed of infusion, within the ranges allowed by TCI pumps, significantly affects the accuracy of Ce predictions. The CSI monitor was shown to be a useful tool to predict LOC in both rapid and slow infusion schemes.
在靶控输注(TCI)期间,丙泊酚效应部位药代动力学模型的性能可能会受到丙泊酚给药速率的影响。本研究比较了三种效应部位药代动力学模型在快速和慢速输注速率下的预测能力,利用脑状态指数(CSI)作为意识监测器。
16 名健康志愿者,年龄 21-45 岁,随机分为两组,分别以 1200ml/h 的速度给予丙泊酚 1.8mg/kg 推注剂量或 12mg/kg/h 输注直至意识丧失(LOC)后 3-5 分钟。在 CSI 自发恢复后,对首先接受输注的患者给予推注,反之亦然。在第二次剂量方案后 CSI 自发恢复后完成研究。记录 LOC 发生时的评估和记录。通过比较推注剂量时和输注方案时 LOC 时估算的效应部位浓度来评估两种给药方案下模型预测的充分性。
推注后 0.97±0.29 分钟发生 LOC,输注方案开始后 6.77±3.82 分钟发生 LOC(P<0.05)。推注剂量时 Schnider(ke0=0.45/min)、Marsh(ke0=1.21/min)和 Marsh(ke0=0.26/min)估算的 Ce 在 LOC 时分别为 4.40±1.45、3.55±0.64 和 1.28±0.44μg/ml,输注方案时分别为 2.81±0.61、2.50±0.39 和 1.72±0.41μg/ml(P<0.05)。推注剂量时 LOC 观察到的 CSI 值为 70±4,输注方案时为 71±2(NS)。
在 TCI 泵允许的范围内,输注速度显著影响 Ce 预测的准确性。CSI 监测器被证明是预测快速和慢速输注方案中 LOC 的有用工具。